Re: DOGE report

On Fri, 9 May 2025 14:17:30 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de>
wrote:

Am 09.05.2025 um 14:07 schrieb Catrike Ryder:

On Fri, 9 May 2025 13:13:35 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de>
wrote:
 

Am 09.05.2025 um 12:01 schrieb Catrike Ryder:

On Fri, 9 May 2025 11:36:34 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de>
wrote:
>

Am 08.05.2025 um 22:53 schrieb cyclintom:

On Thu May 8 12:28:55 2025 Catrike Ryder  wrote:

>
Those are males. Males are not women.

>
The curiosity of this condition is that it does not occur in born women who believe that they were really men.

>
The number of trans men and trans women is very similar (and very small).
>
It's just the "anti-woke" people do not take an issue.
Similarly, Queen Victoria did not ban female homosexuality because
"women do not have sex voluntarily".

>
Homosexuality is not the issue. The issue is men in women's athletics,
rest rooms, and locker rooms. The fact that it doesn't happen every
day, doesn't mean that it's not an issue.

>
Why is "women in mens rest room" not an issue? I personally have to put
up with women in mens rest room at least once a year when the women's
line to the rest room has a 15 minute wait and the mens line to the rest
room is empty.

 
It's because most men don't mind women in their restrooms. Most women
do mind men in their restrooms.

>
IOC.  Most black people don't mind white people in their part of the bus
but most white people mind black people in their part of the bus.
You wish to time-travel back to the 1950's.

Perhaps back in the 1950s, but what's your point?

Do think that because most men don't have a problem with women in
their restrooms, women should not have a problem with men in their
restrooms? If you do, take that issue up with the women in your life.

--
C'est bon
Soloman