Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On 5/13/2025 5:07 AM, zen cycle wrote:On 5/12/2025 6:05 PM, AMuzi wrote:>On 5/12/2025 1:33 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:I think it's a bit of a stretch to blame incidents likeOn 5/12/2025 10:43 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:Pick an administration. Any administration. Select any ofOn Mon, 12 May 2025 09:29:35 -0400, Zen Cycle>
<funkmaster@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>+1 to all of that Roger. The right wing is being told>
by their echo
chamber that this is a major issue that demands major
attention away
from actual problems that affect millions of americans,
when it's an insignificant issue being used as a wedge
and a distraction.
>
Nobody says it's a major issue, but...
But Mr. Timid Tricyclist just won't let it go. It allows
him to hide from discussing the current administration's
crazy incompetence. What a dupe.
>
>
myriad examples of 'crazy incompetence'.
>
USS Gettysburg shot down a fighter from her own carrier
group (USS Truman) in the Biden administration in December.
>
Then USS Truman lost two fighters overboard (one from
sliding tow vehicle in April, one landing arrest failure
in May.) in the 2d Trump administration.
>
https://www.businessinsider.com/us-navy-aircraft-carrier-
red-sea-lost- another-super-hornet-2025-5?op=1
>
One never runs out of examples.
>
>
these on whichever administration is in office. The recent
incidents on the USS Truman for example may have been
incompetence or some other failure of equipment that wasn't
_reasonably_ foreseeable or preventable. Without access to
the Root Cause Failure Analysis we can only speculate. As
much as I consider the existence of trump in the US white
house to be an existential threat to the US, he had nothing
to do with what happened on the USS Truman.
I didn't blame either administration. I merely noted that Mr
Krygowski's term 'crazy incompetence' is quite apt. Always.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.