Re: China Tariff Deal?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: China Tariff Deal?
De : funkmaster (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Zen Cycle)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 16. May 2025, 15:49:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1007jae$36llk$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/16/2025 8:51 AM, AMuzi wrote:
On 5/16/2025 5:35 AM, zen cycle wrote:
On 5/15/2025 9:31 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Thu May 15 18:03:50 2025 John B.  wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 19:45:16 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
On one of the news shows I heard that China has made a tariff deal with
the US. I won't believe that until it is varified by the White House
but this morning I got an add for a 3D printed saddle.
>
They were initially $28 and then after this tariff whoorah they went
  to $56. Then this morning there was an add for the same saddle for
$17-$22. I would take this as a hint that a tariff deal had been set
since China lost 90% of their market and Taiwan picked it up. China
simply could not go on with that for long.
>
But perhaps this was all upon rumors so we have to wait and see.
>
In the real world the US amounts to 14%  of
China's foreign trade.
>
>
>
>
OK, then I guess you don't understand that the US can tell other countries to stop doing business with
China ande make that 14% more than 50%.
>
They can tell other countries whatever they want, it doesn't mena they're going to listen. In fact, china does the same thing.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2708dl9n1o
>
Funny thing, the world being protected by the US nuclear umbrella.
>
The _whole_ world? from what? aliens taking over the jewish space laser satellite network?
>
 That urban myth is actually not true:
 https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/mtg-space-lasers/
 She may be gullible but in this instance did not engage in antisemitism.
 
1) I didn't mention the midge.
b) Your link states "The Republican representative from Georgia has a history of making antisemitic remarks."
She did in fact post a conspiracy rant (not _re_post, it was an original post by her personally) that stated in part:
"oddly there are all these people who have said they saw what looked like lasers or blue beams of light causing the fires."
and
"If they are beaming the suns energy back to Earth, I'm sure they wouldn't ever miss a transmitter receiving station right??!! I mean mistakes are never made when anything new is invented. What would that look like anyway? A laser beam or light beam coming down to Earth I guess. Could that cause a fire? Hmmm, I don't know. I hope not! That wouldn't look so good for PG&E, Rothschild Inc, Solaren or Jerry Brown who sure does seem fond of PG&E."
That's from your link BTW.
3rd) Also from your link:
"Given that Greene did not directly state that "Jewish lasers" caused the fires, but did speculate that laser beams somehow connected to the Rothschild investment firm were a cause, we rate this claim as a "Mixture.""
You can rush to her defense and claim she isn't an anti-semite, but that would be a hard sell for someone who has posted and re-posted conspiracy theories that are at their core antisemitic (blaming the rothchilds in this case).
Meanwhile, you give tommy's "the world being protected by the US nuclear umbrella" a pass.
--
Add xx to reply

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 May 25 * Re: China Tariff Deal?35John B.
16 May 25 +* Re: China Tariff Deal?3John B.
16 May 25 i+- Re: China Tariff Deal?1Roger Merriman
17 May 25 i`- Re: China Tariff Deal?1John B.
16 May 25 +* Re: China Tariff Deal?17zen cycle
16 May 25 i+* Re: China Tariff Deal?8AMuzi
16 May 25 ii`* Re: China Tariff Deal?7Zen Cycle
16 May 25 ii +* Re: China Tariff Deal?4AMuzi
16 May 25 ii i`* Re: China Tariff Deal?3Zen Cycle
16 May 25 ii i `* Re: China Tariff Deal?2Jeff Liebermann
17 May 25 ii i  `- Re: China Tariff Deal?1zen cycle
16 May 25 ii +- Re: China Tariff Deal?1Catrike Ryder
16 May 25 ii `- Re: China Tariff Deal?1Catrike Ryder
17 May 25 i`* Re: China Tariff Deal?8zen cycle
18 May 25 i `* Re: China Tariff Deal?7zen cycle
18 May 25 i  `* Re: China Tariff Deal?6Roger Merriman
18 May 25 i   `* Re: China Tariff Deal?5Roger Merriman
19 May 25 i    `* Re: China Tariff Deal?4zen cycle
19 May 25 i     `* Re: China Tariff Deal?3Frank Krygowski
20 May 25 i      `* Re: China Tariff Deal?2Rolf Mantel
20 May 25 i       `- Re: China Tariff Deal?1Roger Merriman
16 May 25 `* Re: China Tariff Deal?14Shadow
16 May 25  +- Re: China Tariff Deal?1Catrike Ryder
16 May 25  +* Re: China Tariff Deal?7Shadow
17 May 25  i`* Re: China Tariff Deal?6Shadow
18 May 25  i `* Re: China Tariff Deal?5zen cycle
19 May 25  i  +- Re: China Tariff Deal?1Shadow
19 May 25  i  +- Re: China Tariff Deal?1zen cycle
21 May 25  i  `* Re: China Tariff Deal?2Jeff Liebermann
21 May 25  i   `- Re: China Tariff Deal?1zen cycle
17 May 25  `* Re: China Tariff Deal?5Frank Krygowski
17 May 25   `* Re: China Tariff Deal?4Frank Krygowski
18 May 25    +* Re: China Tariff Deal?2Jeff Liebermann
18 May 25    i`- Re: China Tariff Deal?1zen cycle
18 May 25    `- Re: China Tariff Deal?1zen cycle

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal