Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: China Tariff Deal?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: China Tariff Deal?
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 17. May 2025, 20:06:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100amnk$hc3o$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/17/2025 10:49 AM, cyclintom wrote:
On Fri May 16 19:52:44 2025 Frank Krygowski  wrote:
On 5/16/2025 2:23 PM, cyclintom wrote:
There is nothing the US needs from any of you anymore. Hell, we don't even need tropical hardwoods anymore since we have a method of makind common softwoods stronger than steel.
Well _that's_ interesting! So musical instrument makers can stop
worrying about the supply of ebony and rosewood, of blackwood and
mahogany? There's no more need to worry about bans on importing them, etc?
>
Do tell us more! With sources, please.
 I do find it interesting that you have presented yourself as a teacher and cannot look a single thing up. Is that because upon retirement you became instantly stupid, or have you inflicted that upon your students from your very first day?
 https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/12/inventwood-is-about-to-mass-produce-wood-thats-stronger-than-steel/
If you were capable of intelligent and civilized discussion, you could have given that link in your previous post. And you could have given it in that latest post without tossing insults, given the fact that all I did was ask for information.
But since you lack that intelligence, you didn't notice the difference between your _present tense_ assertions ("we don't even need tropical hardwoods any more") and the futuristic speculation of the Techcrunch article.
More briefly: It's a laboratory process. They're hoping to scale it up, but it does not exist as a commercial process now, or (probably) any time soon. They gave no actual numbers on density, tensile strength, impact strength or anything else. And like thousands of other futuristic ideas, maybe it will work someday, maybe it won't.
I predict there is no way it will ever come to "we don't even need tropical hardwoods any more."
--
- Frank Krygowski

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 May 25 * Re: China Tariff Deal?35John B.
16 May 25 +* Re: China Tariff Deal?3John B.
16 May 25 i+- Re: China Tariff Deal?1Roger Merriman
17 May 25 i`- Re: China Tariff Deal?1John B.
16 May 25 +* Re: China Tariff Deal?17zen cycle
16 May 25 i+* Re: China Tariff Deal?8AMuzi
16 May 25 ii`* Re: China Tariff Deal?7Zen Cycle
16 May 25 ii +* Re: China Tariff Deal?4AMuzi
16 May 25 ii i`* Re: China Tariff Deal?3Zen Cycle
16 May 25 ii i `* Re: China Tariff Deal?2Jeff Liebermann
17 May 25 ii i  `- Re: China Tariff Deal?1zen cycle
16 May 25 ii +- Re: China Tariff Deal?1Catrike Ryder
16 May 25 ii `- Re: China Tariff Deal?1Catrike Ryder
17 May 25 i`* Re: China Tariff Deal?8zen cycle
18 May 25 i `* Re: China Tariff Deal?7zen cycle
18 May 25 i  `* Re: China Tariff Deal?6Roger Merriman
18 May 25 i   `* Re: China Tariff Deal?5Roger Merriman
19 May 25 i    `* Re: China Tariff Deal?4zen cycle
19 May 25 i     `* Re: China Tariff Deal?3Frank Krygowski
20 May 25 i      `* Re: China Tariff Deal?2Rolf Mantel
20 May 25 i       `- Re: China Tariff Deal?1Roger Merriman
16 May 25 `* Re: China Tariff Deal?14Shadow
16 May 25  +- Re: China Tariff Deal?1Catrike Ryder
16 May 25  +* Re: China Tariff Deal?7Shadow
17 May 25  i`* Re: China Tariff Deal?6Shadow
18 May 25  i `* Re: China Tariff Deal?5zen cycle
19 May 25  i  +- Re: China Tariff Deal?1Shadow
19 May 25  i  +- Re: China Tariff Deal?1zen cycle
21 May 25  i  `* Re: China Tariff Deal?2Jeff Liebermann
21 May 25  i   `- Re: China Tariff Deal?1zen cycle
17 May 25  `* Re: China Tariff Deal?5Frank Krygowski
17 May 25   `* Re: China Tariff Deal?4Frank Krygowski
18 May 25    +* Re: China Tariff Deal?2Jeff Liebermann
18 May 25    i`- Re: China Tariff Deal?1zen cycle
18 May 25    `- Re: China Tariff Deal?1zen cycle

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal