Re: RE: Re: Average speeds

On 5/19/2025 5:05 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Mon May 19 13:46:33 2025 Jeff Liebermann  wrote:

On Mon, 19 May 2025 20:19:17 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>

On Fri May 16 19:53:39 2025 Jeff Liebermann  wrote:

On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:40:45 -0700, John B.
<jbslocomb@fictitious.site> wrote:
>

On Fri, 16 May 2025 02:11:33 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Is it your insinuation that because Strava shows zero miles that I didn't do 928 miles?

>

Youse guys just like to spend money. I had a mile recording  device
that recorded miles by counting wheel rotations (a known distance). So
time I got  home less time I started divided into distance travelled =
average speed  :-)

>
I suggest you ask yourself "what problem is Tom trying to solve"
before providing solutions.  In this case, the problem is that Tom has
no proof that he actually rode 928 miles over an unspecified time
interval.  Without proof, I do not believe any number provided by Tom,
especially those provided for self-aggrandizement.  That's the real
purpose of Strava and similar online performance logging services.
There's a fairly good chance that the numbers displayed on the Strava
web site are real.  There are ways to tweak the numbers in one's
favor, but why bother when there's no financial or competitive award?
>
Marginally related topic drift:  I did my usual Friday morning walk
this morning.  However, I left my smartphone at home and therefore did
not record my walk on Strava.  So, no data and therefore no proof:
<https://www.strava.com/athlete/training>
Maybe next Friday.

>

Jeff,you do not believe me?

>
Yes, I do not believe you.  Sometimes, you slip and tell the truth,
but most of your amazing facts are lies and fabrications.  It would be
helpful if you would provide proof your amazing rides.
>

Gee, that really hurts my feelings.

>
Do you really believe that anyone believes of your claims?  Most, if
not all are totally unsubstantiated.  It's probably not possible for
anyone to provide evidence and corroboration of all their claims.
However, you provide nothing, which would make anyone highly
suspicious of their validity.  Assertion is not proof.
>
Oh, I almost forgot.  I don't care if your feelings hurt.  Take an
aspirin and you'll probably hurt less.
>

Especially from one who ran right down and got a mRNA vaccination to
prove me wrong.

>
Do you really believe I chose to be vaccinated because of anything
that you said or did?  You must have an over-inflated ego.  Try
setting your pump to a lower pressure.
>

You didn't die right away so you think you're safe.

>
I think that I'm safe:
<https://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/crud/Bicycle-Safety.jpg>
>

h\Hnag in there since it will take at least 5 years for your
body to stop producing spike proteins.

>
In the past, I used to give talks on RF safety.  There was a group
that believed that RF exposure causes brain and CNS (central nervous
system) cancer.  When the number of new brain and CNS cancer cases did
not follow the number of cell phones in use, they decided that there
was a delay before an increase in brain and CNS cancers would appear.
They're still waiting for this non-existent rise in cancers.  Have a
nice long wait:
<https://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/crud/Cellular%20and%20cancer.pdf>
>
May you rot in the hell of your own creation.

    My rides are a very great deal less than your perception of Amazing. Your best buddy Flunky posts about his performance as a very great deal more than mine.

only to expose your lies and misunderstanding of exercise physiology. My performance metrics are far from impressive.

Krygowski who could presently do the same rides as mine if he had the motivation is not complaining since he is very well aware that he could do the same rides I'm doing with a heavy old touring bike.
 Your comments about not believing my "amazing rides" are worth exactly what you are - public assistance.