Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious
De : Soloman (at) *nospam* old.bikers.org (Catrike Ryder)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 21. May 2025, 16:01:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <2dqr2khgpahsgefj0em0musr1sc4pam21o@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 21 May 2025 10:20:27 -0400, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:

On 5/20/2025 4:58 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2025 16:43:34 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
On 5/20/2025 1:38 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2025 11:44:29 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
"Science of cycling still largely mysterious"
>
This article from 2016 recently popped up again:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/science-of-cycling-still-
mysterious-1.3699012
>
As is the case with most issues, if I think I need to know something I
go about trying to learn it. I've little time for learning about stuff
I have no need to know.
>
Yep. So much for curiosity, so much for education... Ignorance is bliss!
>
No, ignorance would be when someone doesn't know something they need
to know.
 
>
the irony of being ignorant of the definition of ignorance.....
>
Just for the edification of the floriduh dumbass - ignorance is not
predicated by need.

Got it...  so, you're ignorant because you don't know how to pilot a
three masted sailing ship into port?

--
C'est bon
Soloman

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 May 25 * Science of cycling still largely mysterious77Frank Krygowski
20 May 25 +* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious57Catrike Ryder
20 May 25 i`* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious56Frank Krygowski
20 May 25 i +* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious48Catrike Ryder
20 May 25 i i+* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious3AMuzi
20 May 25 i ii+- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Roger Merriman
20 May 25 i ii`- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Catrike Ryder
21 May 25 i i`* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious44Frank Krygowski
21 May 25 i i +* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious30Catrike Ryder
21 May 25 i i i`* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious29Frank Krygowski
21 May 25 i i i +* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious11zen cycle
21 May 25 i i i i+* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious9Catrike Ryder
21 May 25 i i i ii`* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious8Frank Krygowski
22 May 25 i i i ii +* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious5Catrike Ryder
22 May 25 i i i ii i`* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious4Frank Krygowski
22 May 25 i i i ii i `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious3Catrike Ryder
22 May 25 i i i ii i  `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious2AMuzi
22 May 25 i i i ii i   `- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Catrike Ryder
24 May 25 i i i ii `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious2Joy Beeson
24 May 25 i i i ii  `- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Catrike Ryder
21 May 25 i i i i`- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Catrike Ryder
21 May 25 i i i `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious17Catrike Ryder
22 May 25 i i i  `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious16Frank Krygowski
22 May 25 i i i   `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious15Catrike Ryder
22 May 25 i i i    +* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious5Catrike Ryder
23 May 25 i i i    i`* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious4Frank Krygowski
23 May 25 i i i    i `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious3Catrike Ryder
23 May 25 i i i    i  `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious2Frank Krygowski
23 May 25 i i i    i   `- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Catrike Ryder
23 May 25 i i i    `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious9Rolf Mantel
23 May 25 i i i     `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious8Catrike Ryder
23 May 25 i i i      +- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Catrike Ryder
23 May 25 i i i      `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious6AMuzi
23 May 25 i i i       `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious5Catrike Ryder
23 May 25 i i i        `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious4AMuzi
23 May 25 i i i         +* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious2Frank Krygowski
23 May 25 i i i         i`- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Catrike Ryder
23 May 25 i i i         `- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Catrike Ryder
21 May 25 i i `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious13zen cycle
21 May 25 i i  +* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious9Catrike Ryder
21 May 25 i i  i`* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious8AMuzi
21 May 25 i i  i +- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Catrike Ryder
21 May 25 i i  i +* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious2zen cycle
21 May 25 i i  i i`- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Catrike Ryder
22 May 25 i i  i +- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1John B.
22 May 25 i i  i +* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious2John B.
22 May 25 i i  i i`- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Catrike Ryder
22 May 25 i i  i `- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Rolf Mantel
21 May 25 i i  `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious3Roger Merriman
21 May 25 i i   +- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Jeff Liebermann
21 May 25 i i   `- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1zen cycle
21 May 25 i +- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Roger Merriman
21 May 25 i `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious6Frank Krygowski
21 May 25 i  `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious5Catrike Ryder
21 May 25 i   `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious4AMuzi
21 May 25 i    `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious3Catrike Ryder
21 May 25 i     `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious2Frank Krygowski
22 May 25 i      `- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Catrike Ryder
21 May 25 `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious19Wolfgang Strobl
21 May 25  +- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Catrike Ryder
21 May 25  `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious17zen cycle
21 May 25   +* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious11Roger Merriman
22 May 25   i`* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious10Frank Krygowski
22 May 25   i +- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Roger Merriman
25 May 25   i +* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious3Roger Merriman
25 May 25   i i`* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious2Frank Krygowski
25 May 25   i i `- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Roger Merriman
25 May 25   i `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious5Wolfgang Strobl
25 May 25   i  `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious4AMuzi
25 May 25   i   `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious3Roger Merriman
25 May 25   i    `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious2Frank Krygowski
26 May 25   i     `- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Roger Merriman
22 May 25   `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious5Wolfgang Strobl
22 May 25    `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious4Frank Krygowski
22 May 25     `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious3Wolfgang Strobl
22 May 25      `* Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious2Frank Krygowski
24 May 25       `- Re: Science of cycling still largely mysterious1Wolfgang Strobl

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal