Re: Bob Parlee - Parlee Cycles

On 10/5/2024 4:14 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 10/5/2024 2:59 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 10:54:51 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

On 10/4/2024 8:27 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 10/4/2024 6:47 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 10/4/2024 4:38 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:03:51 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

On 10/4/2024 1:07 PM, cyclintom wrote:

>
>
John, the CDC is no longer a reliable source of information.

>
Right. Fox News is the only reliable source of information. /s

>
There is no such thing as a media related reliable source of
information.

All is mystery, nothing can be known... OMMMMMMM...
>
>

>
That's not what Mr Tricycle wrote.
>
There are things which can be definitively known. They are in physics
and mathematics textbooks.

>
Yes, things like maximum possible braking deceleration.
>
But there are billions of non-math, non-physics things that are
definitely known.
>

All media reports are slanted, some more, some a lot more, some not so
much and in all the various political and special interest flavors.
>
A media report of 'manicured' government aggregate data is hardly a
definitive source, which was his point.

>
I understood his point. I strongly disagree. It's a sales pitch for
ignorance and for abandonment of social responsibility.

>
>
I'm wondering what kind of "social responsibility" Krygowski thinks I
ought to embrace.
>
-- C'est bon
Soloman

  New Zealand's PM Jacinda Ardern said it best, "Unless you hear it from us, it is not the truth" and "WE are your single source of truth".
 Really; those are  direct quotations from the head of a state with no First Amendment.
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vryqhNf2EzA

I'd say that depends on context, which of course you don't get from a brief YouTube video clip.
In any case, I think a government statement would likely have a better chance of accuracy than, say, a post by some "expert" in San Leandro CA.
--
- Frank Krygowski