Re: RE: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: RE: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 01. Jun 2025, 01:26:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <101g6od$1hvsg$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/31/2025 3:56 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Fri May 30 20:43:02 2025 Frank Krygowski  wrote:
>
Zen is apparently the only one posting here who still races. He should
take comfort in the fact that they found racing to be safer than badminton!
 And you don't find those numbers peculiar? What injuries are sustained in badmitten as opposed to riding down mountain passes in the rain at 50 mph?
Well, Tom, the data I cited was injuries per 1000 hours activity for all the hours spent doing that activity. The bicycling data was for all hours riding bikes. What percentage of _your_ bicycling time is spent descending mountain passes in the rain at 58 mph? For most riders, the answer is zero - meaning your oh-so-scary fantasy is just a fantasy. IOW you're one of those avid cyclists who revel in "Danger! Danger!" warnings about your favorite sport. That's just weird.
And what kind of injuries in badminton? (Or "badmitten" [sic])
I think badminton is vaguely similar to pickleball, which the survey doesn't mention. Many of my club mates have taken up pickleball. As club safety chairman, I've noted we could use a separate pickleball safety chairman, because it's producing FAR more injuries than bicycling, despite club members accumulating much more time on bikes.
Pickleball injuries I've heard of are severe back injuries (one guy is almost unable to walk weeks after that injury), double broken wrists, twisted knees, sprained ankles, mild head injuries, various abrasions and bruises and more. Most of those seem to be a result of falls, but some are just due to the sudden motions of lunging for the ball. I suppose it would be similar for badminton, but I'm not involved in either sport.
BTW, Tom, if you disagree with the data, you should dig up better data. Nobody here has respect for your WAGs.
--
- Frank Krygowski

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 May 25 * "Danger! Danger!" - or not!21Frank Krygowski
31 May 25 +* Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!2AMuzi
1 Jun 25 i`- Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!1Frank Krygowski
31 May 25 +- Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!1Catrike Ryder
31 May 25 +* Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!3Roger Merriman
31 May 25 i+- Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!1Catrike Ryder
1 Jun 25 i`- Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!1zen cycle
31 May 25 +* Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!6Roger Merriman
1 Jun 25 i`* Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!5Frank Krygowski
1 Jun 25 i +* Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!2Roger Merriman
1 Jun 25 i i`- Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!1Catrike Ryder
1 Jun 25 i +- Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!1Catrike Ryder
1 Jun 25 i `- Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!1Frank Krygowski
1 Jun 25 `* Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!8Frank Krygowski
1 Jun 25  +- Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!1Catrike Ryder
1 Jun 25  `* Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!6Frank Krygowski
1 Jun 25   `* Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!5Catrike Ryder
1 Jun 25    `* Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!4Frank Krygowski
1 Jun 25     +- Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!1Catrike Ryder
3 Jun 25     `* Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!2zen cycle
3 Jun 25      `- Re: "Danger! Danger!" - or not!1Catrike Ryder

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal