Sujet : Re: Food Prices
De : Soloman (at) *nospam* old.bikers.org (Catrike Ryder)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 01. Jun 2025, 12:54:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <2ofo3kpnl4itk7aec4epdu7ou1jgfpdu2t@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 31 May 2025 21:31:05 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<
frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 5/31/2025 3:41 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Fri May 30 13:27:04 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 5/30/2025 11:19 AM, cyclintom wrote:
... we now know that 74% of people taking the vaccine suffered permanent
heart damage ...
>
Fascinating! And your source for that factoid is ... ???
Frank, it is very difficult to discover the actual paper ...
>
Because it doesn't exist, and never did. You pulled your WAG out of the
usual orifice.
>
As a question, why are you arguing about this unless all you want to do is claim that I am wrong?
>
Like several people here, I _do_ want to point out that your are wrong.
Part of my motivation is to reduce the likelihood that some naive reader
will actually believe you. You consistently try to spread nonsense. Your
posts are harmful to society.
>
I spent 50 years working on medical devices or laboratory devices designed to detect diseases. Be very sure that you show that as a teacher you know far more about it than I do.
>
From what we can tell, you once programmed motion control in a tabletop
instrument to squirt drops of liquid into an array of test tubes. You've
also claimed to have installed telephone systems, designed critical
communications equipment for space operations and other probably
imaginary projects, which means you didn't put a solid 50 years into
medical equipment. You've never given evidence of any great medical
knowledge, and almost daily you post plenty of evidence that you don't
know your ass from your elbow regarding medicine, economics, history,
bike mechanics and more.
>
Back to your 74% claim: Post a link to a legitimate reference source or
shut up.
"Part of my motivation is to reduce the likelihood that some naive
reader will actually believe you."
No, IMO, all of your motivation is to prop up your own sagging self
image, that you can't do by replying to me.
-- C'est bonSoloman