Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:

On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 09:38:37 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

On 6/1/2025 8:59 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

 
Hard fact is that illegals do not enjoy the same Due Process as
citizens.
 
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/constitution-supreme-court-due-process-trump-deportees-analysis/story?id=121485100
 
The government must provide notice and a hearing in many, but not all,
cases.
 
The text of the Constitution is clear and so is the Supreme Court: All
non-citizens on U.S. soil must be afforded "due process of law."
 
"There are literally millions of aliens within the jurisdiction of the
United States. The Fifth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth
Amendment, protects every one of these persons from deprivation of
life, liberty, or property without due process of law," the late
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote in a unanimous 1976 opinion.
 
So, what does that mean in practice? Not necessarily a lot.
 
President Trump professes that he "does not know" the specifics but
insists that it cannot mean "a million or 2 million or 3 million
trials" for each person in the country unlawfully.
 
Legal experts say Trump is right that the Constitution does not
guarantee a "trial" for every migrant detained and ordered deported at
the border or inside the country. In fact, migrants in the country
illegally do not have extensive procedural protections from removal.
(If they did, it wouldn't have been possible for ICE to deport more
than 270,000 last year.)
 
--
C'est bon
Soloman

>
Interesting charts here:
>
https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/obama-record-deportations-deporter-chief-or-not
>
(Note date at the start of Mr Trump's 1st term)
>
Deportation totals 8 years each of
Mr Clinton 12,290,905
Mr Bush 10,328,850
Mr Obama 5,281,115

In regards to earlier comment about "replacement theory," There's
really need to wonder why the Democrat Party is so eager to allow
illegals in the country.

--
C'est bon
Soloman