Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 14:18:25 -0400, Frank KrygowskiIndeed, you were wrong. Own it.
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 6/1/2025 2:08 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:Krygowski is desperate to prove me wrong, and indeed...On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 14:05:47 -0400, Frank KrygowskiSomeone claiming to be Catrike Ryder did, 5/30, posting here in an
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On 6/1/2025 12:07 PM, AMuzi wrote:>On 6/1/2025 10:41 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:>On 6/1/2025 10:28 AM, AMuzi wrote:>>>
Persons who are present illegally are subject to deportation with
extremely limited process:
>
https://www.usa.gov/deportation-process
>
Mostly a finding of fact that they are, indeed, illegally present.
Didn't you just link the details of "due process"?
>
>
It is quite limited and unlike those for a citizen:
Right. But not nonexistent, as some claim.
Who claimed that?
argument with Zen.
>
=========================
>
[feeble tricyclist:]
Ilegalas [sic] are not entitled to due process.
>
[Zen:] Yes, you braindead magatard, they are:
https://www.statesman.com/story/news/politics/politifact/2025/05/11/yes-immigrants-in-the-u-s-illegally-still-have-due-process-rights/83481316007/
>
"Despite Trump’s dismissal of and questions about due process for
immigrants, the U.S. Constitution, legal experts and decades of court
decisions agree: Immigrants in the U.S., regardless of how they entered
the U.S., legally or illegally, have due process rights."
>
>
[feeble tricyclist:]
>
No, they don't.
>
=========================
>
If you're having memory problems, try taking notes. Or as with Tom,
learn how to re-read what you've posted upthread.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.