Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:

On 6/3/2025 12:01 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 6/3/2025 10:36 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 6/3/2025 8:59 AM, AMuzi wrote:

>
There was a false statement inserted into a filing in re Kilmar
Abrego Garcia that he had been deported in error. The Justice
Department employee who added that was fired the next morning and the
filing emended...

>
Got a citation or other evidence for that claim? And what did the
courts say about this issue? And where is Mr. Garcia now?
>

As Monday morning's NYT for example, whose front page did not cover
the immolation of live US citizens, including a Holocaust survivor,
in Boulder by an illegal jihadi screaming 'free palestine.' Deemed
not interesting enough by editorial staff.

>
I don't get a print edition of NYT; but your complaint seems to be
that eight people getting various degrees of burns did not get enough
attention, despite it being on every news outlet. It looks to me like
NYT has since done many articles on the incident and its implications.
Are you trying to say NYT does sufficiently protest antisemitism?
>
And BTW, what happened was despicable. As you know, I'm firmly against
attempts to harm or kill groups of innocent people. But "immolation of
live US citizens" is more than a little exaggerated. It usually means
burning to death. I gather only one person out of the eight was
seriously burned.
>
There's no excuse for the attack, but you can slightly relax your grip
on your own pearls!
>

 
Airlifted to regional burn center is more serious than any burn I've
ever suffered. HIPA once again interferes with the details but here's
the expert:
 
https://kdvr.com/news/local/burn-surgeon-speaks-on-boulder-terror-
attack-victims-recovery-while-few-still-remain-in-hospital/
 
Six of the 12 victims were not bandaged and discharged. They remain at
the burn center. These are serious injuries.

>
Serious injuries? Yes, and I wouldn't want them. Immolation? No, not by
definition. And your article, while related, is devoid of actual
information about the seriousness of the burns.
>
I'd be happy with the following edit of your statement: "... whose front
page did not cover the serious burn injuries of a few U.S. citizens ..."