Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:

On 6/3/2025 10:53 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 6/3/2025 12:01 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 6/3/2025 10:36 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 6/3/2025 8:59 AM, AMuzi wrote:

>
There was a false statement inserted into a filing in re Kilmar Abrego Garcia that he had been deported in error. The Justice Department employee who added that was fired the next morning and the filing emended...

>
Got a citation or other evidence for that claim? And what did the courts say about this issue? And where is Mr. Garcia now?
>

As Monday morning's NYT for example, whose front page did not cover the immolation of live US citizens, including a Holocaust survivor, in Boulder by an illegal jihadi screaming 'free palestine.' Deemed not interesting enough by editorial staff.

>
I don't get a print edition of NYT; but your complaint seems to be that eight people getting various degrees of burns did not get enough attention, despite it being on every news outlet. It looks to me like NYT has since done many articles on the incident and its implications. Are you trying to say NYT does sufficiently protest antisemitism?
>
And BTW, what happened was despicable. As you know, I'm firmly against attempts to harm or kill groups of innocent people. But "immolation of live US citizens" is more than a little exaggerated. It usually means burning to death. I gather only one person out of the eight was seriously burned.
>
There's no excuse for the attack, but you can slightly relax your grip on your own pearls!
>

>
Airlifted to regional burn center is more serious than any burn I've ever suffered. HIPA once again interferes with the details but here's the expert:
>
https://kdvr.com/news/local/burn-surgeon-speaks-on- boulder-terror- attack-victims-recovery-while-few-still- remain-in-hospital/
>
Six of the 12 victims were not bandaged and discharged. They remain at the burn center. These are serious injuries.

 Serious injuries? Yes, and I wouldn't want them. Immolation? No, not by definition. And your article, while related, is devoid of actual information about the seriousness of the burns.
 I'd be happy with the following edit of your statement: "... whose front page did not cover the serious burn injuries of a few U.S. citizens ..."
 

Odd how two people can watch a video of an old lady rolling in pain under flames and see different things. YMMV.
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971