Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:

kilmar-abrego-garciaOn Wed, 4 Jun 2025 08:59:07 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

On 6/4/2025 6:43 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

kilmar-abrego-garciaOn Wed, 4 Jun 2025 13:27:52 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:

 

Am 04.06.2025 um 11:52 schrieb Catrike Ryder:

On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 11:23:34 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de>
wrote:
>

Am 04.06.2025 um 10:31 schrieb Catrike Ryder:

On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 01:10:55 -0000 (UTC), Beej Jorgensen <beej@beej.us>
wrote:
>

In article <d3vu3k5sec04fbqhmm6sjdktd2t9t5v81r@4ax.com>,
Catrike Ryder  <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

I'm neither in the USA illegally, nor have I committed any crimes, so
you needn't worry.

>
I'm not worried that you're in the US illegally or have committed any
crimes. I'm worried that the government will *say* you're in the country
illegally and then ship you off.
>
There is no law that says the government cannot say you are in the
country illegally. The only thing protecting you is the fact that you
get a hearing.
>
You clearly trust the government far more than I do to be willing to
waive this right.

>
US citizens should indeed get a hearing.

>
Do you mean "people who claim to be US citizens" should get a hearing to
verify whether they are indeed US citizens?

>
No

>
So you claim to be a US citizen, the government claim you're not.
Should you get a hearing or should the government deport you without a
hearing?

 
Good grief...   I'm not going to respond to your hypothetical question
about something that's not going to happen.
 
--
C'est bon
Soloman

>
>
All sorts of things happen.
>
https://www.audacy.com/wbbm780/news/local/51st-murder-case-tied-to-former-cpd-detective-overturned
>
I can't see a policy answer to inherent errors in any large
set with high stakes for the (guilty or innocent)
individual.  We do our best. And fail regularly.