Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:44:04 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:

On 6/5/2025 3:59 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 00:15:09 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:
 

On 6/4/2025 7:43 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

kilmar-abrego-garciaOn Wed, 4 Jun 2025 13:27:52 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:

>

Am 04.06.2025 um 11:52 schrieb Catrike Ryder:

On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 11:23:34 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de>
wrote:
>

Am 04.06.2025 um 10:31 schrieb Catrike Ryder:

On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 01:10:55 -0000 (UTC), Beej Jorgensen <beej@beej.us>
wrote:
>

In article <d3vu3k5sec04fbqhmm6sjdktd2t9t5v81r@4ax.com>,
Catrike Ryder  <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

I'm neither in the USA illegally, nor have I committed any crimes, so
you needn't worry.

>
I'm not worried that you're in the US illegally or have committed any
crimes. I'm worried that the government will *say* you're in the country
illegally and then ship you off.
>
There is no law that says the government cannot say you are in the
country illegally. The only thing protecting you is the fact that you
get a hearing.
>
You clearly trust the government far more than I do to be willing to
waive this right.

>
US citizens should indeed get a hearing.

>
Do you mean "people who claim to be US citizens" should get a hearing to
verify whether they are indeed US citizens?

>
No

>
So you claim to be a US citizen, the government claim you're not.
Should you get a hearing or should the government deport you without a
hearing?

>
Good grief...   I'm not going to respond to your hypothetical question
about something that's not going to happen.

>
... if you're white enough!

 
That's from the guy who actually bragged about riding through a
neighborhood of people of other races.
 
Today I'm planning a solo ride through the inner city, partly to visit
a new library on the far side of town. I'll be riding on <gasp!>
ordinary streets. Many of those streets will have <oh my!> people of
other races living there.
--Frank Krygowski
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/Zu_BtGgv8Fs/m/vkwxt_GNBQAJ?hl=en&hl=en

>
Everybody else here understood the sarcasm, as clearly indicated by the
"<gasp!>" and "<oh my!>".
>
But I suppose if a person is too timid to interact with others in normal
life, obvious conversational clues might be confusing.
>
:-)  And how interesting that our timid tricyclist is saving my posts
for reference! Talk about obsessions!

What's sarcastic about riding where there are people of other races?

I save some of your posts so I can point out **your** obsessions.

*********************************************
Having a gun in the home is not a guarantee someone will get killed.
And
having a gun in the home is not a guarantee it will be effective at
"protection." But there's plenty of data indicating the first is more
likely than the second; IOW for most people, having a gun for
"protection" is probably a bad idea.

Read about it:

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17922-carrying-a-gun-increases-risk-of-getting-shot-and-killed/

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/full/10.7326/M21-3762

https://time.com/6183881/gun-ownership-risks-at-home/

**************************************
_Krygowsi

--
C'est bon
Soloman