Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:

On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 22:39:28 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:

On Tue Jun 3 21:31:05 2025 Beej Jorgensen  wrote:

In article <pnct3k1grlt8flup51ass2pgtactgkfnrd@4ax.com>,
Catrike Ryder  <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

I believe that is the current "level of care."

 
That level of care requires judicial oversight that we are not currently
maintaining, so it's not the current level.
 

I haven't seen anyone sent to the Salvadorian prison who doesn't belong
there.

 
When it comes to the Constitution, what matters is what the courts have
seen, not what you or I have seen.
 
What's the rush? You have the guy in custody--he's not a threat. Give
him a hearing. Maybe during the hearing you'll find that it was illegal
for you to deport him to El Salvador *before* you do it, and you can
deport him, legally, to a different country.

>
>
>
>
Are you saying you're willing to foot the bill for paying for enough prisons to house these people until the inrvitsble "tguilty" sends them on their way. Those sections of the Constitution were written when the Democrats weren't peying criminals to come to the US to practice their trade. I have a next door neighbor who illegally has no insurance, damaged my car and then because their own was dented Gavin Newsom bought them a new Toyota SUV and a new |Mustang musclke car. And that was just last month.

Gavin Handsome ALWAYS gives new cars to republicans. It's why
republicans never move away from California. They LOVE him.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021