Re: Food Prices topic drift to TIME

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 23:54:03 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On 6/5/2025 4:14 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 00:23:17 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:
 

On 6/4/2025 5:58 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 17:20:38 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

On 6/4/2025 3:34 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:

On 6/4/2025 4:59 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:

>
>
Does anyone ever really talk about conversation pieces?

Yes, except you, because you're willfully ignorant.

>
That, plus from what he's posted here, he's too timid to engage in much
conversation. His excuse is that conversation isn't interesting, but how
would he know without conversing?

>
I hear people conversing about insignificant stuff. Religion, sports,
politics, Everybody's opinions, and they bore me. Nothing there for me
to process, which is pretty much what heppens here on RBT.

>
:-)  But you seemed to think it would be fascinating for us to hear
about your Made-In-China barbecue grill!

 
Actually, it's a griddle, not a grill.
 
As for being fascinating, it's something I actually did rather than
your made up story about your imaginary gun designing "friend."

Nope. I don't believe you "actually did" that. I don't believe you can
sing or play even a chord organ. I don't believe you own either a
griddle or a grill.

You seem to think I care what you believe, probably because you're a
narcissistic and care very deeply what others believe about you.

You're the one who always demands documentation and proof, but you've
given none. (A photo of some guy holding a microphone isn't proof.)

Unlike you, I never demand anything. I simply make note of your brags
and that unlike me and others on RBT, you seldom document anything.

You see, I don't brag, I simply post appropriate responses to your
accusations, sometimes documented, sometimes not. You and everyone
else is free to believe them or not. Makes no never-mind to me.

So you're not meeting your own standards. Such internal inconsistency is
a sign of logical weakness at best, and outright lies at worst.

Another display of Krygowski's inability to understand basic logic.

--
C'est bon
Soloman