Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:

On 6/7/2025 12:26 AM, AMuzi wrote:

On 6/6/2025 8:24 PM, Beej Jorgensen wrote:

In article <pbq0Q.746378$qmJf.738823@fx16.iad>,
cyclintom  <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote:

I have a Real ID in my pocket right now. All traveler outside of the
national boundaries has to show proof of citizenship (a passport) at
all times.

>
Indeed, you should carry it inside the national boundaries at all times,
as well, since some people apparently think you can be deported without
a hearing if anyone suspects you of being in the country illegally.
>

Look, I watched approximately 100 illegals vote for Obama at my local
voting place.

>
I'm really curious how you knew for a fact they were illegal. But that's
not really what I'm on about here.
>
What I'm on about is that without a hearing, any crooked cop could point
a finger at you and have you deported to prison for life for being an
illegal immigrant. It's all about the due process.
>

Do you REALLY think that anything close to a majority voted for Biden?

>
I wasn't sure, but after Trump lost 60+ court cases trying to prove
illegal voting activity, I'm pretty confident that things were on the
up-and-up overall. 60+ court cases is a LOT of vetting. Hats off to
Trump for being so thorough. :)
>

 That remains an open question as every one of those was dismissed or decided on standing, latches or other process issues. There was no evidence or testimony entered into a court record.  We just don't know (our own beliefs notwithstanding) and likely never will.
 Questions remain such as
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9647421250

You realize that article doesn't support any allegations of fraud, right?

and the famous 2d graph here
https://leeblynelle.pages.dev/xquypzf-popular-vote-2024-election-totals- eomysyb/
 which may have innocuous explanations. Or not.

Frpom the first link:
"“We are getting very close to having some results from Wisconsin, and I’m seeing a lot of questions like this one, which was directed to the Wisconsin Elections Commission on Twitter,” she said Wednesday morning. “That weird-looking bump in the Wisconsin results is what happened when 170,000 absentee votes from the city of Milwaukee poured in all at once. It’s not nefarious. It’s just counting.” "