Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:

On 6/7/2025 9:28 AM, AMuzi wrote:

On 6/7/2025 6:50 AM, zen cycle wrote:

On 6/7/2025 12:42 AM, AMuzi wrote:

On 6/6/2025 9:41 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 6/6/2025 2:55 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 6/6/2025 1:30 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

>
The "bioweapon" claim is deliberately inflammatory and senseless. Much like the claim from one of my friends, who said all the Covid fuss was just an attempt to influence the election.
>
But I guess conspiracy fans will conspire.   :-/
>
>

>
Both can be true (bioweapon and timed for political advantage). Clear proof (for or against either) will defy historians.

>
And as we know, lack of proof has never deterred conspiracy theorists!
>
>

>
Yes, unknown does not equal true.  Nor false.
>
There was great sympathy in some quarters for Alger Hiss for 40+ years until his KGB file, reports and payroll records were released in the Venona documents.
>
OTOH there will be no 'secrets' revealed in the perhaps once more imminent JFK files release, after 60 years' grace period to destroy anything of import.
>

>
https://archive.is/SDjq1

  We'll see. I don't know and you don't either.

Yes, that was exactly my point. I should have been more clear. It's an accusation, nothing more, but it seems to me if _not_ true that our law-suit happy president would have hit Musk with a libel suit as he has already done on several occasions (vs ABC news, NYT, and E Jean Carrol).

 https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/04/trump-banned-jeffrey-epstein-from-mar-a- lago-for-hitting-on-girl.html
 OTOH despite many promises the materials are still not public. We can hope I suppose.