Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:

On Mon, 09 Jun 2025 04:05:40 -0400, floriduh dumbass
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
 

On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 21:14:54 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
>

On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 16:32:54 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>

On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 09:48:55 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
>

On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 14:48:47 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>

I did
fly several times during that period and I soon realised that the crew
didn't make an issue about lowering the mask below my chin. I walked
around in three airports with the mask hanging around my neck

>
I suppose we'll never know how many people you killed... not
that you would lose a minute's sleep if it had been dozens.
[]'s

>
Don't be silly...  How would I have killed anyone?

>
To deliberately infect someone with a disease is manslaughter
here in Brazil, if the victim dies.

>
>
I had no disease so I couldn't have infected anyone, deliberately, or
otherwise.

  How do you know? Did you do monthly tests? Note most people
were carriers, did not get pneumonia. Only 2% died.
Do a blood test today and see if you were a carrier or not.

>
FWIW, there were others on the plane and in the terminal with masks
lowered or taken off.

  And there are people that shoot up schools. I fail to see how
that justifies manslaughter. "They killed people so I can too".
 

On the other hand, I saw morons wearing masks
out on their bikes, with nobody else within two hundred feet. I saw
other fools, all alone in their vehicles wearing masks. Now we're told
that the cloth masks were worthless, as was the need to stay six feet
apart. Some people think their nanny-governments are honest and
wonderful. I don't.  I think Fauci ought to be in prison

  Cloth masks were excellent, if combined with social
distancing. New Zealand and Australia are proof of that. The disease
only spread when social media belittled the government.

>

Probably not so in the US, or most repuglicans would be in
jail.
[]'s

>
I see you've joined the "make up a nasty pseudo-name for your
opponents" club. Don't you think that's kind of juvenile?   I do.

  What they do is "Ugly". It's an accurate description.
[]'s