Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:

On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:38:35 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

On 6/9/2025 4:08 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 6/9/2025 2:53 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:

On 6/9/2025 2:36 PM, Shadow wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jun 2025 18:10:07 GMT, cyclintom
<cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>
>
Garcia is NOT a citizen and was brought back to answer
crimnal charges of interstate transport of illegal
aliens over a LONG period. There is no protection from
those sorts of charges.

>
    He worked in construction and drove his colleagues to
work.
There is no mention if they were legal or not. If they
were illegal,
it's strange the company that employed them was not fined.
>
    He was fined once for driving with an expired license.
>
    I really don't think driving with an expired license
is more
serious than being a gang member(and possibly a drug
trafficker/murderer). That's reason they said he was sent
to jail
without due process.
    Yet they said they brought him back to try him for 
"more
serious crimes"(the expired driver's license).
    LOL
    Even you must be thinking that's strange.
    Or maybe not.

>
He doesn't, because he believes everything the right wing
media tells him to believe.

 
Tom has gone far beyond that. He's believing what the weird
voices in his head are telling him to believe.
 
As one minor example, I don't think any media, no matter how
far right, have ever claimed Trump had a 76% approval
rating. If that claim was actually made, I'd love to see the
source, just for fun.
 
And BTW, the others on this forum who lean rightward in
their politics really should be trying to discourage Tom's
posting. He's making your position look really, really bad.
 

I usually do not but this morning I gave it my best.
To no avail.
>
p.s. Mr Kunich often begins with a true minuscule factoid
before launching off into outer space, crystals and
hallucinati9ns, all mixed.

Although I believe I share some of Tom's political positions, I
dispute the suggestion that politics expressed by one person on this
very small forum has any significance, regardless of how factual or
foolish it is.

Social media arguments (some people call them discussions) about
politics, religion, guns, bicycle helmets, etc almost always filter
down to what-aboutisms, gotcha traps, and childish name calling with
zero effect on anyone's opinions. 

Unfortunately, people are influenced by the garbage they see and hear
from bureaucrats and media, but repeating it on social media has no
effect because nobody believes anything that comes from their
opponent's media, and usually, rightly so.

I try to stay clear of the Tom Kunich flame fests and generally, my
only "contribution" to the other arguments on RBT is to point out the
foolishness of the arguers and the uselessness of the arguments.

I will express my opinion, but I refuse to be goaded into defending it
for the simple reason that it serves no purpose.

Some would say, and probably will say, that I can't defend my
opinions. However, my opinions are based on my own understanding of
what's right, what's wrong, what's good, and what's bad, and my
refusal to allow other people to influence it , and indeed, that is
difficult to explain further.


--
"Oh, give me the beat boys and free my soul
I want to get lost in your rock and roll and drift away"
- Written by Mentor Williams