Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:

On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:08:15 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

On 6/10/2025 4:09 AM, zen cycle wrote:

On 6/9/2025 11:56 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:

>
One has to wonder why the Democrats are so opposed to
efforts to
ensure that the only votes cast are from people who are
qualified to
vote ...

>

 
They aren't, dumbass. They're against the false trope that
there was widespread fraud. They're against the the lies
that large numbers of unqualified individuals cast votes.
They're against the demonization and assaults on the
character of people who honestly worked their polling places
with integrity and certified election results to a result
that the magatards didn't like.
 
Elections in the the US are free and fair, with minimal
cases of fraud. The vast majority of ineligible votes cast
are the result of administrative errors and mistakes. The
remainder are so small as to constitute an insignificant
blip in the statistical noise.
 
When you want to enact legislation based on lies, you're
doing it wrong.

>
>
https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/la-county-and-state-to-purge-15-million-inactive-voters-from-rolls/6866/
>
https://apnews.com/article/ohio-voters-citizenship-referrals-42799a379bdda8bca7201d6c42f99c65
>
https://www.illinoisreview.com/illinoisreview/2017/09/chicago-more-votes-than-registered-voters.html
>
To "not significant numbers" I say our elections are
routinely decided on small fractions of 1%.

The efforts to keep from verifying the legitamacy of a potential voter
is very telling.. The people who do that seem to be the same people
who resist efforts to rid the country of people in the USA illegally.

--
C'est bon
Soloman