Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 18:11:24 -0000 (UTC), Beej Jorgensen
<beej@beej.us> wrote:

In article <tpfj4kpqav08fnjk4peefa4rn5b40rvq0c@4ax.com>,
Catrike Ryder  <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

The "accused" have a due process right to assert and offer evidense of
their legal status.

>
I'm glad we agree on this point. The only thing we disagree with is to
whom they get to offer this evidence.
>
If they show that proper and correct evidence to an accuser and are let
free, great.
>
But I think it's vital (and the way things have historically been) in
America that people accused of anything, including being non-citizens,
have a right to be heard by a judge before being deported or imprisoned
by an accuser.

Nope, That's not required..

And, correct me if I'm wrong, you only think that's the case for
citizens.

At the least, not for illegals, especially if they're criminals, as is
the case with Garcia, the "Maryland dad."  I'm pretty sure he'll be
tried, found guilty, and be deported agaun.

To which I say there's nothing stopping a malicious accuser from
"losing" the evidence of citizenship and passing judgment, which is why
we have and need a separate legal body to pass judgment.

It would take an official to do that.

Is that the story so far?

 

--
C'est bon
Soloman