Re: Riding a bike a protection and in general

On 6/18/2025 9:11 AM, AMuzi wrote:

On 6/18/2025 7:12 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:

On 6/17/2025 6:01 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 6/17/2025 12:30 PM, cyclintom wrote:

>
If someone enters your property with a gun, you are protecting your
life even if they intend to only steal your car. I cannot tell the
intentions of ANYONE assaulting me in any way.

>
What if a person with a concealed carry license, or a person in an
open carry jurisdiction, carries his gun and enters your property to
ask directions? Would you really blow him away?
>
<https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/12/us/michigan-man-shooting- at-teen-
asking- directions>
>
That kid didn't even carry a gun. But you seem to be saying that if
he had, the homeowner should have killed him.
>
And of course, the kid is black.
>

>
At least he was found guilty, Such incidents many times have more dire
consequences with fewer penalties.
>
https://web.archive.org/web/20180305202556/https://
www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1993/05/24/man- acquitted-of-
killing-japanese-exchange- student/34a75a09-0a7b-468d-89c5-d6d8d7504f7c/
>
And of course, the shooter was acquitted of murdering a teenager
dressed  for a halloween party.
>
"Hattori was dressed as John Travolta in "Saturday Night Fever" and
was brandishing nothing more menacing than a camera"
>
but hey, louisiana....
>
then there's this:
>
https://apnews.com/article/hide-seek-shooting-louisiana- girl-
neighbor-b59a1232f3fd309e1afd02174026fad7
>
"A Louisiana man faces aggravated assault and battery charges after
firing a gun at children who were playing hide and seek outside his
home, wounding a 14-year-old girl, according to the local sheriff’s
office.....The girl suffered a gunshot wound to the back of the head
early Sunday"
>
simple searches don't show what the result of the charges are. I guess
he should be let go, after all, all he did was shoot a 14 year old in
the head while she was running away....Small price to pay for paranoid
white males to keep their deadly toys.
>
(and yes, andrew, we know you're going to counter with the 'hundreds
of case where guns were successfully used in self- defense'...again,
the deaths of a few innocent kids are a small price to pay for
paranoid white males to keep their deadly toys)
>
>
>
>
>

 
No one has been more clear than I on that subject.
 
Deadly force is lawful to counter a credible threat to human life, such
as a home intruder at 3am. It is not reasonable or lawful for imaginary
situations or property, such as a guy stealing hubcaps in the street
outside. Or a child in the yard.
 
State Statutes are relatively uniform in that regard.

>
How about if a guy riding a tricycle on a suburban bike path sees
someone who makes him nervous? Is he allowed to kill the guy, or is he
limited to just "winging" him?