Sujet : Re: Yet Another New Machine
De : muratlanne (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Jim Wilkins)
Groupes : rec.crafts.metalworkingDate : 05. Nov 2024, 03:13:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vgbv1l$17h7a$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3505.912
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
news:vgbl3p$15ami$1@dont-email.me...First off I have "built up" a couple CNC control systems. Designed might be a strong word, but assembled from assorted "black boxes" would not. The thing is the Masso G3 control does "almost" everything in one finished unit for not much more than I could buy the parts, and it appears to be code compatible with what I am already using so the post processor would need little or no modification. Yes I have modified the post processors for all of my different machines. Most are just minor tweaks. Actually I rewrote the macros more than modified the post on the Mach controlled machines, so except for physical capability the code is cross compatible on all of those.
>
Well if I was cheap I could build a controller a lot cheaper, but I'm tired of tweaking machines for weeks to get them to run right.
I was warned to expect 3-4 weeks to ship as they build machines to
order. I got notice this morning my machine is shipping today. I guess
I'll be desperately be trying to build a base and table for it in the
next couple days before it arrives.
-- Bob La LondeCNC Molds N Stuff-------------------------------------------"Designed" or not, system integration can be as challenging as starting from scratch (and understanding everything). I have questions not covered in the instructions, because I often use things in ways the designer didn't expect.Do these things compile to G code?
Usually when I had to do some sort of CAD file conversion it was editable text or there was a high level language available; one job on a custom font design system was in hand-assembled HP 1000 machine language which really makes one earn their pay.