Sujet : Re: Further testing needed ...
De : Snag_one (at) *nospam* msn.com (Snag)
Groupes : rec.crafts.metalworkingDate : 21. Sep 2024, 23:55:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vcnitb$1p0o6$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
On 9/21/2024 4:21 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
"Snag" wrote in message news:vcn5gc$1n35p$1@dont-email.me...
Further testing having been completed the chuck has runout with all 3
sets of jaws of around .007" . Chuck body is more like .002-.003 . A
known straight 1/2" rod is not pointing straight with the ways ...
looks like it's time to set up the toolpost grinder .
So it looks like maybe a cheap chuck , though well made . Fit and
finish are good , everything fits as it should and the scroll moves
smoothly with all 3 pinions . Which brings me to a question - since
there's more than one pinion is it going to make any difference which
one I use ? Do I need to give 'em all 3 a twist when I mount a piece of
stock ?
------------------
In the new Mongolian 6-jaw I cleaned up the scroll plate fit quite closely on its pivot in the body, too tight until it was cleaned. I don't think it could shift away from whichever pinion I tightened. Perhaps it might in a worn chuck.
------------------
I don't think this chuck has much wear . All the jaws look "new" but that doesn't always mean much . I was told the original owner was into woodworking , which doesn't necessarily require the precision needed for metal working . By tightening all 3 pinions I have gotten it down to average .004" , which is pretty close to my original equipment 5" chuck . I can live with that ...
-- SnagVoting for Kamabla after Bidenis like changing your shirt becauseyou shit your pants .