Re: "[T]he right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited."

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rc metalworking 
Sujet : Re: "[T]he right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited."
De : muratlanne (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Jim Wilkins)
Groupes : rec.crafts.metalworking talk.politics.guns
Date : 01. Oct 2024, 12:18:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vdgls7$2n4vf$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3505.912
"Snag"  wrote in message news:vdfgjh$2egfn$1@dont-email.me...
   What you are ignoring is the INTENT behind the 2nd Amendment . The
intent was for the people to be armed equally with the military . And in
fact more than a few of the cannons used in the Revolutionary War were
privately owned ... so ANY limitation of private ownership of armaments
- be it cannons , bombs , full auto rifles or whatever - is technically
unconstitutional . If I wanted any of these I'd have it whether the
gov't liked it or not .
Snag
--------------------------------
Thomas Jefferson owned high capacity military-issue assault rifles, so the Founding Fathers definitely knew of their possibility.
https://www.buckeyefirearms.org/op-ed-thomas-jefferson%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Cassault-rifle%E2%80%9D-%E2%80%93-girardoni-air-rifle
Lewis and Clark carried one and demonstrated it to dissuade hostile attacks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girardoni_air_rifle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pqFyKh-rUI

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Oct 24 * Re: "[T]he right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited."3Snag
1 Oct 24 +- Re: "[T]he right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited."1Jim Wilkins
10 Oct 24 `- Re: "[T]he right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited."1max headroom

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal