Sujet : Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie
De : dsi100 (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (dsi1)
Groupes : rec.food.cookingDate : 26. Apr 2025, 20:21:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <28e895c60db3fc0779c58ad7cdf5562e@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 4:07:20 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On 25 Apr 2025 03:31:01 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
On 2025-04-25, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
<https://cbs2iowa.com/resources/media2/16x9/851/986/0x20/90/abe573fd-0eef-42ac-8a2e-8dc0d7631d54-trump2028.jpg>
>
>
Vance 2028 or Gabbard 2028, so far. Stay tuned. Your "Great Father", me,
probably won't make it that far. I'm sorry, kid. I've given you good
advice. You just don't get it. There's nothing more I can do. :(
>
Gabbard is the anti-gay Hawaiian, right? Not white enough for you, but
at least anti-gay. Is that your stance about her?
It was a surprise to me when she said that pending war plans/attack
schedules were not classified. It's against Samoan culture to tell a lie
- at least, I've never seen a Samoan speak deceptively. It's a shameful
thing that she's done and it'll take her a while to right herself with
the Samoan community - at least to the Samoans that understand what
classified information/security clearances are.
My parents had security clearances with the military. They never talked
about what they did. My wife's dad never talked about what he did.
That's the way it's supposed to work. If my parents or my father-in-law
called their friends and spilled the beans/bragged about what they were
doing, they would have suffered severe consequences.
You can bet that intelligence agencies around the world are aware of
these idiots and are taking advantage of the situation. Contrary to what
the hypnotized MAGA minions believe, America is not stronger or great at
the moment. We've never been weaker or more vulnerable to attack from
China/Russia.
Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
25 Apr 25 | For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 23 | | Bruce |
25 Apr 25 |  Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 7 | | ItsJoanNotJoAnn |
25 Apr 25 |   Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 1 | | Ed P |
25 Apr 25 |   Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 1 | | Bruce |
25 Apr 25 |   Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 3 | | Hank Rogers |
25 Apr 25 |    Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 1 | | gm |
25 Apr 25 |    Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 1 | | gm |
25 Apr 25 |   Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 1 | | Jill McQuown |
25 Apr 25 |  Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 15 | | Leonard Blaisdell |
25 Apr 25 |   Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 7 | | Ed P |
25 Apr 25 |    Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 6 | | Cindy Hamilton |
25 Apr 25 |     Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 5 | | BryanGSimmons |
25 Apr 25 |      Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 1 | | gm |
25 Apr 25 |      Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 3 | | gm |
26 Apr 25 |       Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 2 | | dsi1 |
26 Apr 25 |        Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 1 | | Hank Rogers |
25 Apr 25 |   Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 6 | | Bruce |
26 Apr 25 |    Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 5 | | dsi1 |
26 Apr 25 |     Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 3 | | Hank Rogers |
26 Apr 25 |      Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 2 | | gm |
26 Apr 25 |       Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 1 | | Hank Rogers |
26 Apr 25 |     Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 1 | | gm |
25 Apr 25 |   Re: For Leo, Joan and cshenkie | 1 | | BryanGSimmons |