Re: One-pot dish

On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:27:26 +0000, Bruce wrote:

On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:13:16 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
>

On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:51:53 +0000, Bruce wrote:
>

On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 14:54:39 -0500, Michael Trew
<michael.trew@att.net> wrote:
>

What is unfortunate, is that Heinz surely used a similar ingredient list
to the better foreign ones when it  first established in the US in the
19th century.  I'm not sure how the modern US version is "progress".

>
You're probably right.
>

Anyway, on the supermarket shelves near me, Heinz offers a version
called "Simply Heinz", with real sugar, I believe.

>
I believe that HFCS is cheaper but also sweeter, so you need less,
which makes it cheaper again.

>
You understand the economics of the situation. That's good. You should
be able to see how everything flows forth from the economics in a
predictable manner. Rational, predictable, economics is good economics.

>
If people used their brain and bought the version without HFCS, like
Ed said, then the better version would be economically superior. But
sheeple will be sheeple. Chew, chew, chew.

If pigs could fly, we could use them as food delivery drones.
Sucrose is sugar. Fructose is sugar. Sugar is sugar. I don't have any
particular opinion on either. You certainly do. Why? Use your own words
- if that's even possible any more.