Sujet : Re: Smithey Ironware
De : Bruce (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Bruce)
Groupes : rec.food.cookingDate : 05. Nov 2024, 19:23:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vgdnr8$1l3uc$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:11:38 -0500, Ed P <
esp@snet.n> wrote:
On 11/5/2024 11:56 AM, Bruce wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:07:14 -0500, Ed P <esp@snet.n> wrote:
On 11/5/2024 5:22 AM, Bruce wrote:
>
Our cars are 40 and 24 years old. I'm glad they're checked every year.
I'm also not saying that cars under 5 years of age need yearly safety
checks.
>
But a car is a potential murder weapon. It's irresponsible not to
check them once a year.
>
I understand this is a difficult concept for Americans.
>
Your theory is correct. I've need the faulty practice of it for 63
years of driving.
Given the age of your cars, it is smart to have them checked, but do you
really need a law to do it?
You keep thinking like a responsible person, because you are one. But
think of all the idiots and cheapskates that are driving around.
>
Yes, they circumvent the laws anyway.
In Australia, and maybe in applicable US states as well, the police
have a scanner that automatically reads license plates of passing cars
it sees and checks them in the computer. The computer tells them
whether that car has had its yearly check. If not, you're stopped and
you're in trouble.
-- Bruce<https://emalm.com/?v=SQqZJ>
…