Sujet : Re: Smithey Ironware
De : sss (at) *nospam* example.de (Citizen Winston Smith)
Groupes : rec.food.cookingDate : 01. Nov 2024, 22:39:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vg3hpt$3djk4$12@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/1/2024 3:16 PM, Bruce wrote:
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 21:06:42 +0000, ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net
(ItsJoanNotJoAnn) wrote:
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 19:12:37 +0000, dsi1 wrote:
>
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 19:01:32 +0000, Carol wrote:
>
dsi1 wrote:
>
>
A pan that takes a long time to reach temperature and remains hot
after you turn off the heat source makes no sense at all to me. I
suppose it could work if you have an unreliable heat source like a
wood fire or hot coals. Cast iron would make a lot of sense if you're
camping or in the aftermath of WWIII which, according to the Donald,
is imminent. I better start looking for my CI pan. I ain't dumb!
>
Thus speaketh ignorance. Live happily in ignorance David. You are
determined to.
>
What is ignorant is giving an opinion on another person's opinion. Do
you have an opinion of your own? You believe yourself oh so superior but
you don't have a thing to say. Give your opinion on the pans, not me.
>
>
Give it up David, she burned you and without even using
a cast iron pan.
But Joan, do you want him to lose his half Japanese face?
I have created a portal for you to remain in, with a few of your co-conspirators of course, so have great fun:
https://youtu.be/2u3eQc_rx54
Smithey Ironware
Re: Smithey Ironware
