Re: Smithey Ironware

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rf cooking 
Sujet : Re: Smithey Ironware
De : Bruce (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Bruce)
Groupes : rec.food.cooking
Date : 04. Nov 2024, 04:38:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vg9fk6$part$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:19:22 -0500, Ed P <esp@snet.n> wrote:

On 11/3/2024 8:26 PM, Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:16:30 -0500, Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>
wrote:
 
On 11/2/2024 8:27 PM, Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:57:14 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
>
That's like saying that sometimes you need a car that doesn't brake so
good.
>
That's Michael's specialty.
>
In the past few months, I lost functionality of my 1950 Plymouth due to
the rear brake cylinder going out.  The car quickly rolled back down a
hill into the garage.  That garage door took a few days to fix, and now
the poor car is sitting in the garage with the driver's door bent backwards.
 
That's what I meant. That garage door could also have been a little
girl crossing the street.
 
Compulsory safety checks are a pain, but a necessity IMO.
 
>
I lived in states with mandatory inspection.  Waste of time and money.
I can tell you stories of how people that truly have problems get around
them.
>
I can also tell you stories of how the inspection stations rip off
people that don't need anything.
>
New Jersey has state inspectors so no trying to do work not needed.  My
friend Ron took his car and it failed.  That afternoon, his wife,
wearing a very revealing top, took the car and it passed.
>
Google says:
There is no evidence that states with mandatory vehicle safety
inspections are safer than states without them. In fact, the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) says that mandatory vehicle inspections do
not significantly reduce accident rates. The GAO also says that
mechanical defects are not a major cause of motor vehicle accidents

Older cars especially should be checked for safety. Michael's example
says it all. Our cars are 40 and 24 years old. I WANT them checked
once a year. If the system doesn't work in your country because people
are corrupt, they should do something about that, not stop checking.

AI:
"Yes, yearly safety checks for cars are generally considered useful
and important for several reasons:

    Ensuring Roadworthiness: Regular inspections help identify issues
that may affect the safe operation of the vehicle, such as worn
brakes, tires, or suspension problems. These checks can catch
potential issues before they become dangerous, reducing the risk of
accidents caused by mechanical failure.

    Preventing Major Repairs: Small issues can turn into costly
repairs if left unchecked. Regular inspections allow for early
detection of wear and tear, which can be addressed promptly,
potentially saving on major repairs down the line.

    Reducing Environmental Impact: Many safety inspections include
emissions testing, which helps ensure vehicles are not producing
excessive pollutants. Identifying and fixing emissions-related issues
helps reduce environmental impact, especially from older cars.

    Improving Resale Value: A car with a consistent record of passing
annual safety checks can often retain its value better, as it shows
the vehicle has been well-maintained and is likely in good condition.

    Encouraging Safe Driving Culture: Regular inspections reinforce
the importance of vehicle maintenance and safety among drivers,
promoting a culture where people are more aware of and responsible for
the condition of their cars.

    Legal Compliance and Insurance: In many places, annual safety
checks are required by law. Some insurance policies also require proof
of roadworthiness to provide coverage, so staying up-to-date with
inspections can help prevent legal and financial issues.

While some argue that newer cars may not need yearly checks, as they
are less likely to have issues, most cars experience some degree of
wear and tear over time, especially with regular use. Yearly
inspections provide peace of mind and help keep vehicles safe and
efficient on the road."

--
Bruce
<https://emalm.com/?v=SQqZJ>

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 Oct 24 * Smithey Ironware239Ed P
31 Oct 24 +- Re: Smithey Ironware1Hank Rogers
31 Oct 24 +* Re: Smithey Ironware236ItsJoanNotJoAnn
31 Oct 24 i+- Re: Smithey Ironware1Ed P
31 Oct 24 i`* Re: Smithey Ironware234D
31 Oct 24 i +* Re: Smithey Ironware231dsi1
31 Oct 24 i i`* Re: Smithey Ironware230D
31 Oct 24 i i +* Re: Smithey Ironware227dsi1
1 Nov 24 i i i+- Re: Smithey Ironware1Hank Rogers
1 Nov 24 i i i+* Re: Smithey Ironware34Ed P
1 Nov 24 i i ii+- Re: Smithey Ironware1ItsJoanNotJoAnn
1 Nov 24 i i ii+* Re: Smithey Ironware4dsi1
1 Nov 24 i i iii`* Re: Smithey Ironware3Carol
1 Nov 24 i i iii `* Re: Smithey Ironware2Hank Rogers
9 Nov 24 i i iii  `- Re: Smithey Ironware1BryanGSimmons
1 Nov 24 i i ii`* Re: Smithey Ironware28jmcquown
1 Nov 24 i i ii +* Re: Smithey Ironware25Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii i`* Re: Smithey Ironware24dsi1
1 Nov 24 i i ii i +- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii i `* Re: Smithey Ironware22Ed P
1 Nov 24 i i ii i  +* Re: Smithey Ironware8jmcquown
1 Nov 24 i i ii i  i+- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii i  i+* Re: Smithey Ironware3Bruce
1 Nov 24 i i ii i  ii`* Re: Smithey Ironware2Citizen Winston Smith
9 Nov 24 i i ii i  ii `- Re: Smithey Ironware1BryanGSimmons
1 Nov 24 i i ii i  i+- Re: Smithey Ironware1Bruce
1 Nov 24 i i ii i  i+- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii i  i`- Re: Smithey Ironware1Jim
1 Nov 24 i i ii i  +- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii i  `* Re: Smithey Ironware12Carol
1 Nov 24 i i ii i   +* Re: Smithey Ironware10jmcquown
1 Nov 24 i i ii i   i+* Re: Smithey Ironware6ItsJoanNotJoAnn
1 Nov 24 i i ii i   ii+- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
2 Nov 24 i i ii i   ii`* Re: Smithey Ironware4Carol
2 Nov 24 i i ii i   ii +* Re: Smithey Ironware2Jim
3 Nov 24 i i ii i   ii i`- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
3 Nov 24 i i ii i   ii `- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii i   i+- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
2 Nov 24 i i ii i   i`* Re: Smithey Ironware2Carol
2 Nov 24 i i ii i   i `- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii i   `- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii `* Re: Smithey Ironware2Hank Rogers
9 Nov 24 i i ii  `- Re: Smithey Ironware1BryanGSimmons
1 Nov 24 i i i+* Re: Smithey Ironware190D
1 Nov 24 i i ii`* Re: Smithey Ironware189dsi1
1 Nov 24 i i ii +* Re: Smithey Ironware3Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii i`* Re: Smithey Ironware2dsi1
1 Nov 24 i i ii i `- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii +* Re: Smithey Ironware184Carol
1 Nov 24 i i ii i+* Re: Smithey Ironware24dsi1
1 Nov 24 i i ii ii+* Re: Smithey Ironware10ItsJoanNotJoAnn
1 Nov 24 i i ii iii+* Re: Smithey Ironware2Bruce
1 Nov 24 i i ii iiii`- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii iii+- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
2 Nov 24 i i ii iii`* Re: Smithey Ironware6Carol
2 Nov 24 i i ii iii +* Re: Smithey Ironware4dsi1
2 Nov 24 i i ii iii i+* Re: Smithey Ironware2gm
3 Nov 24 i i ii iii ii`- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
3 Nov 24 i i ii iii i`- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
3 Nov 24 i i ii iii `- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii ii+- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii ii`* Re: Smithey Ironware12D
2 Nov 24 i i ii ii `* Re: Smithey Ironware11dsi1
2 Nov 24 i i ii ii  `* Re: Smithey Ironware10D
2 Nov 24 i i ii ii   +* Re: Smithey Ironware6dsi1
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii   i+- Re: Smithey Ironware1D
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii   i+- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii   i`* Re: Smithey Ironware3Citizen Winston Smith
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii   i `* Re: Smithey Ironware2dsi1
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii   i  `- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii   `* Re: Smithey Ironware3Citizen Winston Smith
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii    `* Re: Smithey Ironware2D
4 Nov 24 i i ii ii     `- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii i+* Re: Smithey Ironware158jmcquown
1 Nov 24 i i ii ii+- Re: Smithey Ironware1Hank Rogers
1 Nov 24 i i ii ii+* Re: Smithey Ironware2Bruce
1 Nov 24 i i ii iii`- Re: Smithey Ironware1Jim
1 Nov 24 i i ii ii+- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
2 Nov 24 i i ii ii`* Re: Smithey Ironware153Carol
2 Nov 24 i i ii ii `* Re: Smithey Ironware152jmcquown
2 Nov 24 i i ii ii  +* Re: Smithey Ironware138jmcquown
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii  i+* Re: Smithey Ironware125dsi1
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii  ii+* Re: Smithey Ironware123Bruce
4 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii`* Re: Smithey Ironware122Michael Trew
4 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii +* Re: Smithey Ironware53Bruce
4 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i`* Re: Smithey Ironware52Ed P
4 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i +- Re: Smithey Ironware1Bruce
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i `* Re: Smithey Ironware50jmcquown
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  +* Re: Smithey Ironware48Bruce
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i`* Re: Smithey Ironware47Ed P
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i +* Re: Smithey Ironware31Bruce
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i i`* Re: Smithey Ironware30Cindy Hamilton
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i i +* Re: Smithey Ironware23Bruce
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i i i+* Re: Smithey Ironware19Ed P
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i i ii`* Re: Smithey Ironware18Bruce
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i i ii `* Re: Smithey Ironware17Ed P
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i i ii  `* Re: Smithey Ironware16Bruce
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i i ii   +* Re: Smithey Ironware4ItsJoanNotJoAnn
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i i ii   i`* Re: Smithey Ironware3Bruce
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i i ii   i `* Re: Smithey Ironware2ItsJoanNotJoAnn
6 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i i ii   i  `- Re: Smithey Ironware1Bruce
7 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i i ii   `* Re: Smithey Ironware11Michael Trew
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i i i`* Re: Smithey Ironware3Cindy Hamilton
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i i +* Re: Smithey Ironware3Mike Duffy
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i i `* Re: Smithey Ironware3Bruce
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  i `* Re: Smithey Ironware15Michael Trew
5 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii i  `- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
4 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii +* Re: Smithey Ironware8dsi1
4 Nov 24 i i ii ii  iii `* Re: Smithey Ironware60Carol
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii  ii`- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii  i+* Re: Smithey Ironware10Cindy Hamilton
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii  i+- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
4 Nov 24 i i ii ii  i`- Re: Smithey Ironware1Carol
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii  +* Re: Smithey Ironware9dsi1
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii  +- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
3 Nov 24 i i ii ii  +- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
4 Nov 24 i i ii ii  +- Re: Smithey Ironware1Carol
4 Nov 24 i i ii ii  `- Re: Smithey Ironware1Carol
1 Nov 24 i i ii i`- Re: Smithey Ironware1Citizen Winston Smith
1 Nov 24 i i ii `- Re: Smithey Ironware1D
7 Nov 24 i i i`- Re: Smithey Ironware1dsi1
9 Nov 24 i i `* Re: Smithey Ironware2BryanGSimmons
31 Oct 24 i `* Re: Smithey Ironware2ItsJoanNotJoAnn
31 Oct 24 `- Re: Smithey Ironware1D

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal