Sujet : Re: Jill's recipe for soft and chewy oatmeal cookies
De : Hank (at) *nospam* nospam.invalid (Hank Rogers)
Groupes : rec.food.cookingDate : 07. Nov 2024, 01:26:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vgh1ge$2bctk$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
jmcquown wrote:
On 11/5/2024 6:02 PM, Graham wrote:
On 2024-11-05 2:56 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
On 11/4/2024 6:09 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2024-11-04 3:22 p.m., Graham wrote:
I've just made a batch of the Soft and chewy oatmeal cookies using the
recipe that Jill posted. However, I converted the larger volumetric
measurements to weights using the Amendola & Rees Baker's Manual.
The cookies are great and this batch is for my son who is visiting and
returns home tomorrow.
On Friday I may make a batch with gluten free AP flour. I'm tempted to
add nuts next time and possibly swap the molasses for maple syrup.
>
It's an interesting looking recipe. I would be curious about the maple syrup. I am not sure that it would be better than molasses. I mentioned earlier about the oatmeal cookies my wife gets at the corner bakery. They have oatmeal and molasses and I have to say it is a great combination. They also have craisins in them. I can't eat those cookies because they have walnuts, but the nut free nibbles I have had convinced me they are close to the best cookies ever.
>
>
The original recipe I was given mentioned optional 1/2 c. of finely chopped toasted walnuts. I left it out when I typed it because she doesn't usually add them.
>
Jill
If I make some for my w/e kaffeeklatsch, I'll have to omit any nuts as
one member of the group has various digestive issues.
Well hey, nuts were listed as optional and the cookies taste great without them!
Jill
I think he is smarting off to your Majesty.
He should have kept his mouth shut.