Sujet : Re: [OT] Tyson/Paul
De : Bruce (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Bruce)
Groupes : rec.food.cookingDate : 19. Nov 2024, 19:26:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vhil89$1vbc4$6@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:17:11 +0000, Daniel <
me@sc1f1dan.com> wrote:
Cindy Hamilton <chamilton5280@invalid.com> writes:
>
On 2024-11-16, Ed P <esp@snet.n> wrote:
On 11/16/2024 8:12 AM, jmcquown wrote:
On 11/15/2024 10:09 PM, ItsJoanNotJoAnn wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 1:22:57 +0000, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
>
It's free on Netflix and hasn't started yet. I haven't seen a boxing
match since Sugar Ray Leonard, a long, long time ago. So, what the Hell?
Why not?
>
[ObFood] Steak, baked potato and canned green beans.
>
I really hadn't planned on this, but it's *FREE*!
>
leo
>
>
I've been seeing some blurbs here and there about this
match. But isn't Tyson too old to be climbing back in
the ring?? How old is the other boxer?
It does seem Tyson would be a little long in the tooth. I remember
seeing him box on TV when he got his start in the 1980's. That was well
before he went a little nuts and bit Holyfield's ear during a match.
Jill
>
Was not worth watching. It was just an old man getting beat up Netflix
was the winner.
>
Under what circumstances is it worth watching two men beating on
each other in earnest?
>
It's just a sport.
No, it's not.
-- Bruce<https://i.postimg.cc/zf7JhPvB/the-lord-of-the-rings.jpg>
[OT] Tyson/Paul
Re: [OT] Tyson/Paul
