Re: PING! Michael

Graham wrote:

On 2024-11-23 2:45 p.m., jmcquown wrote:

On 11/23/2024 3:27 PM, ItsJoanNotJoAnn wrote:

On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:14:17 +0000, Bruce wrote:
>

On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:59:05 +0000, ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net
(ItsJoanNotJoAnn) wrote:
>

On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 16:12:58 +0000, jmcquown wrote:
>

On 11/23/2024 10:45 AM, Graham wrote:

>
Whereas some US states "Education" Departments want to indoctrinate
kids with Bible myths.
>

I'd rather they be indoctrinated with that than the latest
LBQT++ or any other ridiculous boys and girls should pee
together ruling.  Let's not forget let a boy wear a skirt
and he can compete against the girls because after all men
can have babies, too.  Never mind Bobby wants to be called
them or they while Susie wants to be called he.

>
This is called a strawman. First you completely exaggerate a viewpoint
you disagree with and then you attack your own exaggerated version.
>

Well hey, I was never indoctrinated in Bible myths and I attended US
schools.
>
Jill
>

Same here.  No one was 'indoctrinated.'

>
If you weren't indoctrinated, why do you take all those fairytales
from the bible literally? That must have been pumped into you from
childhood.
>
>

There were no bible classes in school.  None, nada, zip,
zilch, zero.  Prove the bible classes at church are
fairytales.

>
Exactly right, Joan.  There were no bible classes in school.  Only if
someone was attending a private religious school was the bible ever
mentioned.  No prayers, none of that hogwash.

>
>
Haven't you been following the news about Texas and Oklahoma?
>
OB Food. Just baked a batch of GF choc chip cookies from a WaPo recipe.
Now off to clear the 15cms+ from the diveway.

Now, don't go having a HEART ATTACK whilst shoveling that snow, Dear
Graham...!!!
<chuckle>
😁
--
GM