Re: Breakfast for six days

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rf cooking 
Sujet : Re: Breakfast for six days
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : rec.food.cooking
Date : 07. Dec 2024, 22:03:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <9d95023e-9f37-b6a2-5b79-1a4318f8b58c@example.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
On Sat, 7 Dec 2024, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

On 2024-12-07, Carol <cshenk@virginia-beach.com> wrote:
Ed P wrote:
>
On 12/6/2024 5:18 PM, Carol wrote:
>
It seems there are several types of white pizzas.
>
one I've seen several times uses a standard jar of premade garlic
parmesan Alfredo sauce (note some screaming as some believe it can't
have the name 'Alfredo' unless it's just butter and parmesan aka
Italian recipe'.  I mean the cream and milk version commonly started
with a roux.  Example: Classico and Ragu brands (there are many
brands).  It's basically creamy white cheese vs tomato based.
>
There's a lot of them.  Some appeal to me and some don't.
>
Chef Alfredo made a particular combination of ingredients.  When you
change it, your new version is something else.
>
<https://www.walmart.com/ip/Classico-Signature-Recipes-Roasted-Garlic-Alfredo-Pasta-Sauce-15-oz/10307636>
>
Someone forgot to tell American markets that the name in our stores is
wrong.
>
I go with the mainstream USA.  It's also one of the few I can't scratch
make for less (though the scratch version is better).
>
You're indulging in the _Argumentum ad populum_ logical fallacy, also known
as the Bandwagon Fallacy.  Just because a lot of people think something
is true, doesn't make it true.
>
Followed by what I like to call the "Mother's Contradiction":
If everyone was jumping off the Empire State Building, would you
do it too?
>
Strictly speaking this is incorrect, since we are talking about subjective taste preferences. If Carols states she likes something, and that it happens to be mainstream, it could very well be that she actually likes it, and that there is no connection between that fact, and, that it also happens to be mainstream.
So your attempt at logically refuting an argument about taste, just failed miserably.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Dec 24 * Breakfast for six days57Ed P
3 Dec 24 +- Re: Breakfast for six days1ItsJoanNotJoAnn
4 Dec 24 `* Re: Breakfast for six days55Carol
5 Dec 24  `* Re: Breakfast for six days54Carol
6 Dec 24   `* Re: Breakfast for six days53D
6 Dec 24    +- Re: Breakfast for six days1D
6 Dec 24    +- Re: Breakfast for six days1clams casino
6 Dec 24    +* Re: Breakfast for six days12dsi1
6 Dec 24    i+- Re: Breakfast for six days1clams casino
6 Dec 24    i+* Re: Breakfast for six days2dsi1
6 Dec 24    ii`- Re: Breakfast for six daysMan!1clams casino
6 Dec 24    i`* Re: Breakfast for six days8D
6 Dec 24    i `* Re: Breakfast for six days7dsi1
6 Dec 24    i  +* Re: Breakfast for six days5clams casino
7 Dec 24    i  i`* Re: Breakfast for six days4dsi1
7 Dec 24    i  i `* Re: Breakfast for six days3clams casino
7 Dec 24    i  i  `* Re: Breakfast for six days2dsi1
7 Dec 24    i  i   `- Re: Breakfast for six days1clams casino
7 Dec 24    i  `- Re: Breakfast for six days1D
6 Dec 24    +* Re: Breakfast for six days36Carol
6 Dec 24    i+* Re: Breakfast for six days8clams casino
6 Dec 24    ii+* Re: Breakfast for six days4clams casino
6 Dec 24    iii`* Re: Breakfast for six days3D
6 Dec 24    iii `* Re: Breakfast for six days2clams casino
7 Dec 24    iii  `- Re: Breakfast for six days1D
6 Dec 24    ii`* Re: Breakfast for six days3D
6 Dec 24    ii `* Re: Breakfast for six days2clams casino
7 Dec 24    ii  `- Re: Breakfast for six days1D
6 Dec 24    i+* Re: Breakfast for six days24D
6 Dec 24    ii`* Re: Breakfast for six days23Carol
6 Dec 24    ii +* Re: Breakfast for six days2Bruce
7 Dec 24    ii i`- Re: Breakfast for six days1Hank Rogers
7 Dec 24    ii +* Re: Breakfast for six days17Ed P
7 Dec 24    ii i+- Re: Breakfast for six days1Hank Rogers
7 Dec 24    ii i+* Re: Breakfast for six days6Bruce
7 Dec 24    ii ii`* Re: Breakfast for six days5dsi1
7 Dec 24    ii ii +- Re: Breakfast for six days1clams casino
9 Dec 24    ii ii `* Re: Breakfast for six days3Leonard Blaisdell
9 Dec 24    ii ii  `* Re: Breakfast for six days2dsi1
9 Dec 24    ii ii   `- Re: Breakfast for six days1clams casino
7 Dec 24    ii i`* Re: Breakfast for six days9Carol
7 Dec 24    ii i +- Re: Breakfast for six days1Bruce
7 Dec 24    ii i `* Re: Breakfast for six days7Cindy Hamilton
7 Dec 24    ii i  +* Re: Breakfast for six days2clams casino
7 Dec 24    ii i  i`- Re: Breakfast for six days1D
7 Dec 24    ii i  +- Re: Breakfast for six days1D
8 Dec 24    ii i  `* Re: Breakfast for six days3Ed P
8 Dec 24    ii i   +- Re: Breakfast for six days1Hank Rogers
8 Dec 24    ii i   `- Re: Breakfast for six days1Bruce
7 Dec 24    ii `* Re: Breakfast for six days3D
7 Dec 24    ii  `* Re: Breakfast for six days2Carol
7 Dec 24    ii   `- Re: Breakfast for six days1D
7 Dec 24    i`* Re: Breakfast for six days3Jill McQuown
7 Dec 24    i +- Re: Breakfast for six days1Carol
7 Dec 24    i `- Re: Breakfast for six days1clams casino
6 Dec 24    `* Re: Breakfast for six days2Carol
6 Dec 24     `- Re: Breakfast for six days1clams casino

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal