Re: Redefining eternity

On 12/22/2024 12:28 PM, Bruce wrote:

On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 10:50:19 -0700, clams casino <cc@invalid.cc>
wrote:
 

On 12/21/2024 6:22 PM, Bruce wrote:

On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 00:26:38 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
>

He wasn't interested in talking about other posters and dissing them.

>
That's a nice way of saying he was so self-centered, self-absorbed or
whatever you want to call it that he was barely aware other people in
RFC existed, except to the degree that they fed his need for
attention.

>
Making him precisely the same solipsist as the charter members of the
sisterhood.
>
His only flaw - not being subordinate to them.
>
As for other people existing, he certainly did his best to try and
recover his relationship with Bryan, albeit unsuccessfully.

 Can you imagine John discussing a topic other than John himself, here?
Any topic?

Sure - his hand-dipped chocolates.
His Leaf.
His porch remodel.
His music system.
Etc...

He also engaged with all on a lot of other subjects.

 What, shaving his balls? His auto-erotic adventures? His meds and how
he did or did not take them? His tenants? It was all me, me, me and
very repetitive.

Sure - his hand-dipped chocolates.
His Leaf.
His porch remodel.
His music system.
Etc...

Dave Smith exists in a state of constant familial reminisence here, and
the Dataw queen and her henchwoman Carol are prone to state their likes
and dislikes on every foodstuff known to mankind.
>
Iow - just how much personal genuflection are you proposing need be
offered to the ruling RFC class insure a non-bullying experience here?

 I don't like their attitude either. I've criticised them and made fun
of them. That immediately lead to their killfile, because they take
themselves very seriously and have little sense of humour.

All true.
I think physical mockery is somewhat more effective, but not a lot.

This made folks here even more angry. It's a rather interesting thing.

>
He didn't anger me. His bullies angered me more. But he was a weak,
odd fruitcake. And we all know how the RFC bullies deal with people
they perceive as weak.

>
This is true, and this is reason enough for them to get as much slop
back on their plates as the heaping servings of control and mockery they
ladle out themselves.
>
Right???

 It depends how.
 

That it does!