Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rf cooking 
Sujet : Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted
De : chamilton5280 (at) *nospam* invalid.com (Cindy Hamilton)
Groupes : rec.food.cooking
Date : 06. Feb 2025, 16:10:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vo2jcs$30gm0$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2025-02-06, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
On 2025-02-06 4:12 a.m., Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2025-02-06, ItsJoanNotJoAnn <ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net> wrote:
>
 
No. Is that possible? I have a bunch of remotes, all different. I've
never found a new one that works with U-Verse, and I've tried.
AT&T wants U-Verse to go away. If you're not a current customer, you
can't buy it. I was lucky to get another DVR. The tech said it was
probably refurbished. He was certainly right.
>
I have four. One is for my TV, one for the satellite, one for the DVD
player and one for the sound bar.  Pressing the satellite remote will
turn on the receiver, the TV and the sound bar. The sound bar defaults
to a mode other than the optic cable it is connected with. My wife
cannot watch that TV unless I am home to turn it on for her.

Our TV is connected via Ethernet to our cable modem.  One remote
for the TV and soundbar (both are Samsung); another remote for
the DVD player, which we rarely use.

Is your wife ineducable?

--
Cindy Hamilton

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Feb 25 * [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted38Leonard Blaisdell
6 Feb 25 +* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted12ItsJoanNotJoAnn
6 Feb 25 i+* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted3gm
6 Feb 25 ii+- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1D
6 Feb 25 ii`- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1ItsJoanNotJoAnn
6 Feb 25 i+* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted7Leonard Blaisdell
6 Feb 25 ii+- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1Bruce
6 Feb 25 ii+* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted2Cindy Hamilton
7 Feb 25 iii`- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1songbird
6 Feb 25 ii+- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1ItsJoanNotJoAnn
7 Feb 25 ii`* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted2songbird
7 Feb 25 ii `- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1Mike Duffy
6 Feb 25 i`- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1D
6 Feb 25 +* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted3gm
6 Feb 25 i`* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted2Leonard Blaisdell
6 Feb 25 i `- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1gm
6 Feb 25 +- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1D
6 Feb 25 +* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted2Cindy Hamilton
6 Feb 25 i`- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1D
6 Feb 25 `* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted19dsi1
6 Feb 25  +* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted16ItsJoanNotJoAnn
6 Feb 25  i+* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted9dsi1
6 Feb 25  ii+- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1Bruce
6 Feb 25  ii`* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted7ItsJoanNotJoAnn
6 Feb 25  ii +* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted2dsi1
9 Feb 25  ii i`- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1Leonard Blaisdell
7 Feb 25  ii `* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted4songbird
7 Feb 25  ii  +- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1Mike Duffy
7 Feb 25  ii  `* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted2Cindy Hamilton
8 Feb 25  ii   `- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1songbird
7 Feb 25  i+* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted2songbird
7 Feb 25  ii`- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1D
9 Feb 25  i`* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted4Leonard Blaisdell
9 Feb 25  i `* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted3Cindy Hamilton
9 Feb 25  i  `* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted2Leonard Blaisdell
9 Feb 25  i   `- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1Cindy Hamilton
8 Feb 25  `* Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted2Michael Trew
8 Feb 25   `- Re: [OT] Tragedy, narrowly averted1dsi1

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal