Re: rpbc's - sad face

On 2025-02-12, Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On 2025-02-12, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>

What sham was that? He paid hush money to porn actress. That was bad
enough but he the felony part was the paper trail to hide the payments
as legal expenses. He falsified business records. It was not a sham. He
was convicted.

>
>
Deep-state manipulation of, at best misdemeanors, into felonies is the
real crime. For anyone but him, the hush money would be classified as a
NDA and not subject to prosecution. The prosecutors dug deep and
flipped existing law onto its head to convict him.
The majority of us figured that out. I feel bad for the rest.
Is common sense starting to return? Probably not. :(
I remember Russian Show Trials. I thought, "Thank God, that can't happen
here!" I was wrong.

Yes, it should have been the classified documents case. 

And don't give me any shit about turning up a couple of documents
in Biden's garage.  Trump flagrantly abused the law; he can't
say he didn't know he had them because some were in his desk
drawer at Mar-a-Lago.

--
Cindy Hamilton