Re: this is actually pretty interesting

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rf cooking 
Sujet : Re: this is actually pretty interesting
De : songbird (at) *nospam* anthive.com (songbird)
Groupes : rec.food.cooking
Date : 20. Feb 2025, 05:08:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the little wild kingdom
Message-ID : <9fmi8l-qec1.ln1@anthive.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Ed P wrote:
...
I have my own method that works for me. I make 4 X-large eggs at a time,
pretty much out of the fridge.
>
Small pot holds 4 eggs nicely.  Fill enough to cover eggs when inserted.
Bring to a rolling boil, insert the four eggs.
Boil six minutes, remove from heat
Take two eggs, run under water so you can handle them  Crack shell with
a knife, split open and you have nice soft boiled eggs.
>
Leave the other two sit in the pot.  The next day you have nice hard
boiled eggs.
>
Try it one time, adjust in 30 second increments if you want them a bit
different.

  if needed adjust for altitude.

  in recent times we've not been doing many boiled eggs
but before this era we were boiling up to 18 eggs at a
time and unfortunately it has never been consistently
done to a degree i find useful.  the most recent time i
made a bad mistake and some were undercooked and it was
horrible to peel them.

  because i am not the primary cook and only help out my
suggestions for using timers and set temperatures or
other ways of trying to get more consistency are pretty
much ignored or discouraged because she doesn't want to
think about it.

  glad to say we're not doing many eggs now with them
being expensive.  what eggs we're doing are cracking
a few in a bowl and covering it and then microwaving
until desired level of done is accomplished.  not a
thing i do at all.  i'll pan fry them in butter if i
want an egg sandwich or sunny side up for toast any
other way is simply scrambled and that works fine in
the microwave for me (a little runny in the center is
ok as they will cook to done enough for me when i
stir them).


  songbird

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Feb 25 * this is actually pretty interesting20Tahitian pearl
19 Feb 25 +* Re: this is actually pretty interesting15Ed P
19 Feb 25 i+* Re: this is actually pretty interesting4Graham
19 Feb 25 ii`* Re: this is actually pretty interesting3Janet
19 Feb 25 ii `* Re: this is actually pretty interesting2Graham
20 Feb 25 ii  `- Re: this is actually pretty interesting1songbird
19 Feb 25 i+- Re: this is actually pretty interesting1Cindy Hamilton
19 Feb 25 i+* Re: this is actually pretty interesting7BryanGSimmons
19 Feb 25 ii`* Re: this is actually pretty interesting6Ed P
19 Feb 25 ii +* Re: this is actually pretty interesting4Cindy Hamilton
19 Feb 25 ii i`* Re: this is actually pretty interesting3BryanGSimmons
19 Feb 25 ii i +- Re: this is actually pretty interesting1Bruce
19 Feb 25 ii i `- Re: this is actually pretty interesting1Andy Gerald
19 Feb 25 ii `- Re: this is actually pretty interesting1BryanGSimmons
19 Feb 25 i+- Re: this is actually pretty interesting1dsi1
20 Feb 25 i`- Re: this is actually pretty interesting1songbird
25 Feb 25 `* Re: this is actually pretty interesting4dsi1
25 Feb 25  +- Re: this is actually pretty interesting1gm
25 Feb 25  `* Re: this is actually pretty interesting2Janet
25 Feb 25   `- Re: this is actually pretty interesting1dsi1

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal