Re: Thursday Night Leftovers! 3/13/2025

On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:08:08 +0000, D wrote:

>
>
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025, dsi1 wrote:
>

On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:05:03 +0000, Ed P wrote:
>

On 3/17/2025 12:29 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>

>
People don't feel badly about eating fish because fishes lack the
ability of evoking an emotional response from humans. Their faces are
not capable of conveying any messages to us about their emotional state.
You can whack them with a hammer and their faces remain unchanged. The
same is not true with humans.
>

>
Thank you for this information.  Your well thought out logic opens new
food sources.
>
Hammer a fish.  No facial change, OK to eat it.
Hammer a human.  If no facial change, OK to eat it.
>
It won't be every one, of course, but if you are fast and sneaky you can
do it.

>
I've never been able to sneak up on and hammer somebody without some
facial response. I bow to your skill level. My guess is our food sources
will remains the same.
>

>
Note that the is a trick here. The size of the hammer is not specified,
nor is the force it hits with. Imagine a tiny hammer, barely touching
someones head, and there is a hue chance you will be able to eat that
person!

I used to have a tiny hammer and a tiny tool set and worked on tiny
things. I could walk up to somebody and hit them on the head with the
hammer and they'd think it was the funniest thing in the world.
Then you'd eat them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Om83v9chFlY