Re: The Holiday Inn family Chick'n Dinner in 1962.

On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 02:22:52 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:

On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 23:33:08 +0000, Bruce wrote:
>

On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 22:33:07 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
>

On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 7:10:23 +0000, Bruce wrote:
>

I don't always see the big deal in stuff that's popular with young
people. Taylor Swift, for instance, sounds very middle of the road to
me. Girlie music. Of course, I'm not the target audience. I often do
like more alternative new stuff. Australian Triple J station can be
good if the DJ doesn't think they're more important than the music.

>
You're not supposed to see what's the big deal with the younger
generation. You were raised on radio and TV. They were raised on the
internet, video games, and social media. It'll be the millennials
complaining about the younger generation after the boomers. Every
generation gots to complain about the next generation's music. And the
beat goes on.

>
I'm not complaining about the younger generation. When I was young,
crap music was also popular. And there's always good music too, just
not in the charts, generally speaking.
>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjbInjYp2ew

>
I bet Lady Gaga's old news already. In 3 days she'll be 39. She's a
grandma!

>
I'm glad you're not complaining. Old geezers complaining about the
younger generation is lame.

I agree.

That's why I only complain about the
boomers. Your estimation of Lady Gaga is not quite accurate.
>
https://www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcintyre/2025/03/22/lady-gagas-mayhem-outsold-the-next-10-bestselling-albums-in-america-combined/

Yes, she's still relevant, but also with the under twenties? Or where
do we stop measuring? If Bruce Springsteen can still fill big stadiums
with 45+ aged audiences, is he still relevant? I think so.

--
Bruce
<https://i.postimg.cc/5NvHwfF0/trumpputin.jpg>