Re: Win 10

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rf cooking 
Sujet : Re: Win 10
De : dsi100 (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (dsi1)
Groupes : rec.food.cooking
Date : 15. Jul 2025, 07:47:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <31a99b4dfddbf0b690f760ee2fe0355e@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 22:36:45 +0000, gm wrote:
>
Cheer up, and gets Yooseself a Ford Falcon...!!!
>
Curbside Classic: 1961 Falcon – How To Build A Winning Compact
>
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-american/curbside-classic-1961-falcon-how-to-build-a-winning-compact-2/#comments
>
"Didn’t Ford get it right in 1960? It certainly won the compact war that
launched that year...  The story of the Falcon is that rare triumph of
rationality in Detroit...
>
The Falcon was conceived under the reign of Robert McNamara, that
paragon of the rational and pragmatic manager. He oversaw every unloving
detail, and the end result speaks for itself: a very compact car that
weighed a mere 2400 lbs yet could sit six (slim) adults in an interior
not all that much smaller than a big Ford. Its 20-25 mpg was a huge
improvement over the big cars too. No frills anywhere, and a sub $2000
price to go right up against the imports. Take that, Volkswagen!
>
Some have thrown aspersions at the Falcon, that it was designed to be a
“disposable” car. How do you explain this 65 year - old daily driver?
Old Falcons are easy enough to keep running forever...
>
Seems like the 1st gen Falcon was the first ‘forever’ car, at least for
a domestic...
>
A regularly maintained Falcon could still work as basic, routine Point-A
to Point-B transportation, with the most minimal of fuss, even in
today’s world. It’s not likely the same could be said for just about any
other 65 year old car..."
>
I've driven a 65 Mustang, which is a re bodied Falcon. What a shitty
experience that was. My 65 Cheby Nova was a better driver.
OTOH, my mom's 84 Mustang LX was a wonderful ride. The interior was nice
and cozy. It had an awesome, smooth, V6 engine. The fastback body was
trick - it was actually a hatchback.
https://www.allfordmustangs.com/media/1984-mustang-lx-v6.145033/full
--

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Jul 25 * Re: Win 1068ItsJoanNotJoAnn
12 Jul 25 `* Re: Win 1067Bryan Simmons
12 Jul 25  +- Re: Win 101Bruce
12 Jul 25  `* Re: Win 1065Michael Trew
12 Jul 25   `* Re: Win 1064Bruce
12 Jul 25    `* Re: Win 1063Hank Rogers
12 Jul 25     `* Re: Win 1062Bruce
12 Jul 25      `* Re: Win 1061Hank Rogers
12 Jul 25       +* Re: Win 1059Bruce
13 Jul 25       i`* Re: Win 1058Hank Rogers
13 Jul 25       i `* Re: Win 1057Bruce
13 Jul 25       i  +* Re: Win 102Hank Rogers
13 Jul 25       i  i`- Re: Win 101Bruce
14 Jul 25       i  `* Re: Win 1054dsi1
14 Jul 25       i   +- Re: Win 101Hank Rogers
14 Jul 25       i   +* Re: Win 1050Bruce
14 Jul 25       i   i+* Re: Win 102Hank Rogers
14 Jul 25       i   ii`- Re: Win 101Bruce
15 Jul 25       i   i`* Re: Win 1047dsi1
15 Jul 25       i   i +* Re: Win 103Bruce
15 Jul 25       i   i i`* Re: Win 102dsi1
15 Jul 25       i   i i `- Re: Win 101Bruce
15 Jul 25       i   i +* Re: Win 1040Leonard Blaisdell
16 Jul16:26       i   i i+* Re: Win 1035Michael Trew
16 Jul18:17       i   i ii+* Re: Win 103Hank Rogers
16 Jul19:05       i   i iii`* Re: Win 102Mike Duffy
16 Jul20:30       i   i iii `- Re: Win 101Hank Rogers
16 Jul18:26       i   i ii+* Re: Win 105Bruce
16 Jul18:51       i   i iii+- Re: Win 1018===D~~~
16 Jul20:24       i   i iii`* Re: Win 103Hank Rogers
16 Jul20:28       i   i iii +- Re: Win 101Bruce
16 Jul20:33       i   i iii `- Re: Win 101gm
16 Jul21:01       i   i ii+* Re: Win 103S Viemeister
16 Jul21:31       i   i iii+- Re: Win 101ItsJoanNotJoAnn
16 Jul23:39       i   i iii`- Re: Win 101Jill McQuown
16 Jul23:30       i   i ii`* Re: Win 1023Jill McQuown
17 Jul00:06       i   i ii +* Re: Win 104ItsJoanNotJoAnn
18 Jul01:33       i   i ii i+* Re: Win 102Leonard Blaisdell
18 Jul01:40       i   i ii ii`- Re: Win 101Ed P
17 Jul00:53       i   i ii i`- Re: Win 101Hank Rogers
17 Jul00:39       i   i ii +* Re: Win 104Hank Rogers
17 Jul00:48       i   i ii i`* Re: Win 103Bruce
17 Jul01:06       i   i ii i +- Re: Win 101Hank Rogers
17 Jul02:40       i   i ii i `- Re: Win 101Hank Rogers
17 Jul03:53       i   i ii +* Re: Win 1010Ed P
17 Jul04:00       i   i ii i+* Re: Win 102Bruce
22 Jul08:53       i   i ii ii`- Re: Win 101Janet
17 Jul18:10       i   i ii i+* Re: Win 106Ed P
17 Jul19:12       i   i ii ii`* Re: Win 1058===D~~~
17 Jul20:58       i   i ii ii `* Re: Win 104Bruce
17 Jul21:34       i   i ii ii  `* Re: Win 103Hank Rogers
17 Jul21:43       i   i ii ii   `* Re: Win 102Bruce
17 Jul23:34       i   i ii ii    `- Re: Win 101Hank Rogers
19 Jul12:48       i   i ii i`- Re: Win 101songbird
17 Jul23:48       i   i ii +* Re: Win 103Jill McQuown
18 Jul04:04       i   i ii i+- Re: Win 101Bruce
19 Jul12:50       i   i ii i`- Re: Win 101songbird
22 Jul08:44       i   i ii `- Re: Win 101Janet
16 Jul23:31       i   i i`* Re: Win 104Jill McQuown
18 Jul02:53       i   i i +- Re: Win 101Leonard Blaisdell
17 Jul03:49       i   i i `* Re: Win 102Ed P
17 Jul03:52       i   i i  `- Re: Win 101Bruce
15 Jul 25       i   i `* Re: Win 103dsi1
15 Jul 25       i   i  +- Re: Win 101Bruce
15 Jul 25       i   i  `- Re: Win 101Hank Rogers
14 Jul 25       i   `* Re: Win 102gm
15 Jul 25       i    `- Re: Win 101dsi1
13 Jul 25       `- Re: Win 101Cindy Hamilton

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal