Re: Win 10

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rf cooking 
Sujet : Re: Win 10
De : Hank (at) *nospam* nospam.invalid (Hank Rogers)
Groupes : rec.food.cooking
Date : 17. Jul 2025, 02:40:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1059k9r$115o4$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.21
Bruce wrote on 7/16/2025 6:48 PM:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 18:39:14 -0500, Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid>
wrote:
 
Dave Smith wrote on 7/16/2025 5:41 PM:
>
Good to see you back Jill. Hope you are fully recovered soon.
>
I just had a phone call from my SiL who sends regrets for being unable
to attend my wife's birthday bash. It's a big one.... 80. We had
reserved enough room for her family at a very nice brunch buffet at a
nice Toronto restaurant.   SiL suffers  from ulcerative colitis and it
is really acting up. She is also suffering from light headedness.
>
My wife is bummed that her big sister won't be able to make it and was
tempted to cancel. Others are coming a long way for it, including a
nephew and his wife who are leaving in a few weeks for a 3 year
deployment to Singapore.  The down side is the the big niece will be
there.  At least it is a buffet for at least one of use will be getting
our money's worth.
>
Thanks for the heads up Dave.  Please let us know how it goes.  You
haven't been to a function with the big niece in a very long time, so
we'll be chomping at the bit!
 She could be skinny on Ozempic and writing in a public forum about Big
Uncle.
 
There's a "law" firm near me. Run by an old guy and his two children.  A boy and a girl.  For many many years, these kids weighed about 400 lbs. HUGE.
Suddenly, they shrank to nothing.  Almost overnight they became super skinny, almost ghastly looking.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Jul 25 * Re: Win 1068ItsJoanNotJoAnn
12 Jul 25 `* Re: Win 1067Bryan Simmons
12 Jul 25  +- Re: Win 101Bruce
12 Jul 25  `* Re: Win 1065Michael Trew
12 Jul 25   `* Re: Win 1064Bruce
12 Jul 25    `* Re: Win 1063Hank Rogers
12 Jul 25     `* Re: Win 1062Bruce
12 Jul 25      `* Re: Win 1061Hank Rogers
12 Jul 25       +* Re: Win 1059Bruce
13 Jul 25       i`* Re: Win 1058Hank Rogers
13 Jul 25       i `* Re: Win 1057Bruce
13 Jul 25       i  +* Re: Win 102Hank Rogers
13 Jul 25       i  i`- Re: Win 101Bruce
14 Jul 25       i  `* Re: Win 1054dsi1
14 Jul 25       i   +- Re: Win 101Hank Rogers
14 Jul 25       i   +* Re: Win 1050Bruce
14 Jul 25       i   i+* Re: Win 102Hank Rogers
14 Jul 25       i   ii`- Re: Win 101Bruce
15 Jul 25       i   i`* Re: Win 1047dsi1
15 Jul 25       i   i +* Re: Win 103Bruce
15 Jul 25       i   i i`* Re: Win 102dsi1
15 Jul 25       i   i i `- Re: Win 101Bruce
15 Jul 25       i   i +* Re: Win 1040Leonard Blaisdell
16 Jul16:26       i   i i+* Re: Win 1035Michael Trew
16 Jul18:17       i   i ii+* Re: Win 103Hank Rogers
16 Jul19:05       i   i iii`* Re: Win 102Mike Duffy
16 Jul20:30       i   i iii `- Re: Win 101Hank Rogers
16 Jul18:26       i   i ii+* Re: Win 105Bruce
16 Jul18:51       i   i iii+- Re: Win 1018===D~~~
16 Jul20:24       i   i iii`* Re: Win 103Hank Rogers
16 Jul20:28       i   i iii +- Re: Win 101Bruce
16 Jul20:33       i   i iii `- Re: Win 101gm
16 Jul21:01       i   i ii+* Re: Win 103S Viemeister
16 Jul21:31       i   i iii+- Re: Win 101ItsJoanNotJoAnn
16 Jul23:39       i   i iii`- Re: Win 101Jill McQuown
16 Jul23:30       i   i ii`* Re: Win 1023Jill McQuown
17 Jul00:06       i   i ii +* Re: Win 104ItsJoanNotJoAnn
18 Jul01:33       i   i ii i+* Re: Win 102Leonard Blaisdell
18 Jul01:40       i   i ii ii`- Re: Win 101Ed P
17 Jul00:53       i   i ii i`- Re: Win 101Hank Rogers
17 Jul00:39       i   i ii +* Re: Win 104Hank Rogers
17 Jul00:48       i   i ii i`* Re: Win 103Bruce
17 Jul01:06       i   i ii i +- Re: Win 101Hank Rogers
17 Jul02:40       i   i ii i `- Re: Win 101Hank Rogers
17 Jul03:53       i   i ii +* Re: Win 1010Ed P
17 Jul04:00       i   i ii i+* Re: Win 102Bruce
22 Jul08:53       i   i ii ii`- Re: Win 101Janet
17 Jul18:10       i   i ii i+* Re: Win 106Ed P
17 Jul19:12       i   i ii ii`* Re: Win 1058===D~~~
17 Jul20:58       i   i ii ii `* Re: Win 104Bruce
17 Jul21:34       i   i ii ii  `* Re: Win 103Hank Rogers
17 Jul21:43       i   i ii ii   `* Re: Win 102Bruce
17 Jul23:34       i   i ii ii    `- Re: Win 101Hank Rogers
19 Jul12:48       i   i ii i`- Re: Win 101songbird
17 Jul23:48       i   i ii +* Re: Win 103Jill McQuown
18 Jul04:04       i   i ii i+- Re: Win 101Bruce
19 Jul12:50       i   i ii i`- Re: Win 101songbird
22 Jul08:44       i   i ii `- Re: Win 101Janet
16 Jul23:31       i   i i`* Re: Win 104Jill McQuown
18 Jul02:53       i   i i +- Re: Win 101Leonard Blaisdell
17 Jul03:49       i   i i `* Re: Win 102Ed P
17 Jul03:52       i   i i  `- Re: Win 101Bruce
15 Jul 25       i   i `* Re: Win 103dsi1
15 Jul 25       i   i  +- Re: Win 101Bruce
15 Jul 25       i   i  `- Re: Win 101Hank Rogers
14 Jul 25       i   `* Re: Win 102gm
15 Jul 25       i    `- Re: Win 101dsi1
13 Jul 25       `- Re: Win 101Cindy Hamilton

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal