Sujet : Re: OneDnD seems to mainstream psionics
De : justisaur (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Justisaur)
Groupes : rec.games.frp.dndDate : 25. Apr 2024, 22:43:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v0eipj$37jkh$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/25/2024 10:57 AM, Kyonshi wrote:
On 4/25/2024 6:16 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
Don't forget warlocks, which didn't use to be a thing but now are. On the other hand it sounds as if those they want to have are just variations on fighters and thieves instead of proper psions.
Warlocks and Sorcerers were both added in 3.5e I liked the iterations in that edition much better. They both feel like they should be sub-classes and in optional books. Do you really need 3 charisma based arcane full caster base classes in the PHB? Heck there's only 2 full physical classes.
As much as I love psionics, I'd prefer it also in another optional book as they're loading too much into the PHB already.
(I actually
think the word psion is kind of cool, and it's a pity it now sounds like a piece of antiquated telecommunications technology)
It sounds the same as my old car - a Scion. I'll play a Psion xB, he's a bit boxy, but gets you around town with the kids. :)
-- -Justisaur ø-ø(\_/)\ `-'\ `--.___, ¶¬'\( ,_.-'
\
^'