Sujet : Re: OneDnD seems to mainstream psionics
De : weberm (at) *nospam* polaris.net (Ubiquitous)
Groupes : rec.games.frp.dndDate : 23. May 2024, 08:54:47
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <XamdnY8Tb4bEa9P7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
In article <
v0eipj$37jkh$2@dont-email.me>,
justisaur@yahoo.com wrote:
On 4/25/2024 10:57 AM, Kyonshi wrote:
On 4/25/2024 6:16 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
Don't forget warlocks, which didn't use to be a thing but now are. On
the other hand it sounds as if those they want to have are just
variations on fighters and thieves instead of proper psions.
>
Warlocks and Sorcerers were both added in 3.5e I liked the iterations
in that edition much better. They both feel like they should be
sub-classes and in optional books. Do you really need 3 charisma based
arcane full caster base classes in the PHB? Heck there's only 2 full
physical classes.
I like Warlocks as witches and would play up the being a servant to a
higher power (not necceassrily a deity) better than previous attempts,
though I liked the one in Dragon Magazine a lot.
-- Let's go Brandon!