Re: OneDnD seems to mainstream psionics

In article <v0gdb2$3o4p8$1@dont-email.me>, justisaur@yahoo.com wrote:

On 4/26/2024 1:52 AM, Kyonshi wrote:

On 4/25/2024 11:43 PM, Justisaur wrote:

On 4/25/2024 10:57 AM, Kyonshi wrote:

On 4/25/2024 6:16 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

Don't forget warlocks, which didn't use to be a thing but now are. On
the other hand it sounds as if those they want to have are just
variations on fighters and thieves instead of proper psions.

>
Warlocks and Sorcerers were both added in 3.5e  I liked the iterations
in that edition much better.  They both feel like they should be
sub-classes and in optional books.  Do you really need 3 charisma
based arcane full caster base classes in the PHB?  Heck there's only 2
full physical classes.

 
Warlocks were introduced in 3.5? Must have missed that, but I got
disinterested about that edition pretty quick. I burned out on 3e back
in the day and got completely turned off when 4e came around. That's
when I shifted to older editions.

>
Complete Arcane player's handbook. I did have someone play it.  It felt
very underpowered, but it had a lot more sustain with eldritch blast
than wizards.  It's much better balanced in 5e

If memory serves, Warlocks in 3.x could cast Eldritch Blast whenever they
wanted, a rule a min-maxer friend of mine used for his PCs.

--
Let's go Brandon!