Sujet : Re: OneDnD seems to mainstream psionics
De : gmkeros (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Kyonshi)
Groupes : rec.games.frp.dndDate : 23. May 2024, 11:31:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Campaign Wiki
Message-ID : <v2n7ov$32fi2$1@sibirocobombus.campaignwiki>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Betterbird (Windows) Hamster/2.1.0.1548
On 4/25/2024 11:43 PM, Justisaur wrote:
On 4/25/2024 10:57 AM, Kyonshi wrote:
On 4/25/2024 6:16 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
>
Don't forget warlocks, which didn't use to be a thing but now are. On the other hand it sounds as if those they want to have are just variations on fighters and thieves instead of proper psions.
Warlocks and Sorcerers were both added in 3.5e I liked the iterations in that edition much better. They both feel like they should be sub-classes and in optional books. Do you really need 3 charisma based arcane full caster base classes in the PHB? Heck there's only 2 full physical classes.
As much as I love psionics, I'd prefer
Nitpick: sorcerers were a core class in 3e. Warlocks came in a supplement in 3.5.
I never really got sorcerers, I think they were supposed to be what the warlock became later, just that it wasn't mechanically set apart from wizards all that much.