Re: OneDnD seems to mainstream psionics

gmkeros@gmail.com wrote:

On 4/25/2024 11:43 PM, Justisaur wrote:

On 4/25/2024 10:57 AM, Kyonshi wrote:

On 4/25/2024 6:16 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

Don't forget warlocks, which didn't use to be a thing but now are. On
the other hand it sounds as if those they want to have are just
variations on fighters and thieves instead of proper psions.

 
Warlocks and Sorcerers were both added in 3.5e  I liked the iterations
in that edition much better.  They both feel like they should be
sub-classes and in optional books.  Do you really need 3 charisma based
arcane full caster base classes in the PHB?  Heck there's only 2 full
physical classes.
 
As much as I love psionics, I'd prefer

>
Nitpick: sorcerers were a core class in 3e. Warlocks came in a
supplement in 3.5.
>
I never really got sorcerers, I think they were supposed to be what the
warlock became later, just that it wasn't mechanically set apart from
wizards all that much.

Sorcerers were created for people who didn't want to play a Wizard and deal
with its limitations. I liked it!

--
Let's go Brandon!