'hobbit' generic/scientific term now that should be used

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rgf dnd 
Sujet : 'hobbit' generic/scientific term now that should be used
De : dchmelik (at) *nospam* gmail.com (David Chmelik)
Groupes : rec.games.frp.dnd
Date : 04. Nov 2024, 08:07:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vg9rrn$3m880$4@dont-email.me>
User-Agent : Pan/0.154 (Izium; 517acf4)
'Hobbit' is a generic/scientific term now that should be used.  For over
20 years, science refers to ancient small humans as 'hobbits', which might
even fit some current-day people.  So, Dungeons & Dragons should just re-
add the term.  Most/all my D&D groups used the term.

Of course, D&D can't re-add terms 'balrog', 'ent', 'nazgul', etc., which
are in first edition, replaced in second edition (literary edition, not
ruleset edition, which didn't change).


Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Nov 24 * 'hobbit' generic/scientific term now that should be used7David Chmelik
6 Nov 24 +* Re: 'hobbit' generic/scientific term now that should be used3Kyonshi
7 Nov 24 i`* Re: 'hobbit' generic/scientific term now that should be used2Spalls Hurgenson
7 Nov 24 i `- Re: 'hobbit' generic/scientific term now that should be used1Kyonshi
7 Nov 24 `* Re: 'hobbit' generic/scientific term now that should be used3Zaghadka
8 Nov 24  +- Re: 'hobbit' generic/scientific term now that should be used1Kyonshi
9 Nov 24  `- Re: 'hobbit' generic/scientific term now that should be used1Spalls Hurgenson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal